snpthecat said:
dotted line
Oh, that works, thank you!
Topic: "Do we have a tag for that" thread
Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions
Do we have a tag for: Fellatio, the receiver is lying on their back, the giver is almost in the 69 position (for orientation) but their head is trapped by the receiver doing a leg_wrap. Usually the giver is lying almost parallel next to them. The scene is in this post that made me think of this question, because I've seen it often enough to consider it a particular position
post #2750774
Yoo is there a tag for the chill guy, guy.
adored said:
Yoo is there a tag for the chill guy, guy.
y e s
adored said:
y e s
glad i could help ^^
Do we have a well-used tag for bodies/bodyparts that are made via psychic projection? Example is whenever Sans art has him creating any part with his blue energy. Someone opted to call it an ectobody which doesn't feel like a valid tag. It only has 13 uses and after looking through older Sans posts I haven't seen anything other than translucent_body to reference it
r00kie64 said:
Hey does anyone know where this art is from
Wrong forum
I feel like there should be a tag for an otherwise fully human penis that has a knot on a non-canid. mismatched_animal_genitalia implies a full red rocket, calling it mismatched_hybrid_genitalia feels more like it would mean a knotted horsecock on an otter, maybe mismatched_anthro_genitalia?
kevsnowcat said:
I feel like there should be a tag for an otherwise fully human penis that has a knot on a non-canid. mismatched_animal_genitalia implies a full red rocket, calling it mismatched_hybrid_genitalia feels more like it would mean a knotted horsecock on an otter, maybe mismatched_anthro_genitalia?
watsit said:
knotted_humanoid_penis.
I meant in the context of the mismatched genitalia tags. A feline shouldn't have a knot, but using mismatched_animal_genitalia isn't quite right for a knotted humanoid penis (idiopathic_knot?).
kevsnowcat said:
I meant in the context of the mismatched genitalia tags. A feline shouldn't have a knot, but using mismatched_animal_genitalia isn't quite right for a knotted humanoid penis (idiopathic_knot?).
Knotted_feline_penis also exists
Do we have a tag for mouths that open up like flowers?
examples:
post #5362130 post #3978378 post #4352809 post #2518731
dreamscreep said:
Do we have a tag for mouths that open up like flowers?
examples:
post #5362130 post #3978378 post #4352809 post #2518731
split_head or split_jaw. also, multi_jaw is used a few times.
we might want to consider aliasing these together at some point.
dba_afish said:
split_head or split_jaw. also, multi_jaw is used a few times.we might want to consider aliasing these together at some point.
Lmao split_jaw is a slur for the Halo Elites
kevsnowcat said:
I feel like there should be a tag for an otherwise fully human penis that has a knot on a non-canid. mismatched_animal_genitalia implies a full red rocket, calling it mismatched_hybrid_genitalia feels more like it would mean a knotted horsecock on an otter, maybe mismatched_anthro_genitalia?
I've seen non-canine_knot used for situations like this.
Do we have a tag for characters with more than two butt cheeks, regardless of how many legs they have? I couldn't find any tags that covered it. Should we make one, or is it too niche?
post #5490536 post #3114641 post #5025113
Edit: formatting
Is there a tag for "consensual infidelity" where the cheatee/cuck is not present? I would use consensual_cuckquean but she isn't present in the scene.
Example: in this animation, Bandit mentions they're recording the sex as a video for his wife Chili. So it's not infidelity as it's not a violation of their relationship's rules, but also isn't cuckquean because she isn't visually present.
post #4944685
munchmallow-frosty said:
I've seen non-canine_knot used for situations like this.Do we have a tag for characters with more than two butt cheeks, regardless of how many legs they have? I couldn't find any tags that covered it. Should we make one, or is it too niche?
post #5490536 post #3114641 post #5025113
Edit: formatting
multi_butt has a handful of posts but doesn't seem to be well-defined or is misapplied
I know we have "unavailable-at-source" but do we have a tag for e621 being the last remaining source for an image or that all known sources of the image have been deleted?
There is a tag for cum_on_food but is there a tag for fucking the food directly?
notthatsunny said:
There is a tag for cum_on_food but is there a tag for fucking the food directly?
food_penetration/food_insertion
arekusu said:
multi_butt has a handful of posts but doesn't seem to be well-defined or is misapplied
I see. Maybe we should work on the wiki to define it better.
Hi. Excuse me please, I'm new here. Is there a tag for when a sexy looking character breaks through a wall/door/window, ect. I mean, you already have defenestration and autodefenestration for when a character crashes through a window. (Autodefenestration is when the character goes through the window on the character's own will.) you have already destruction though when I go through destruction I mostly get Macrofurs wrecking buildings and cities and the like.
arekusu said:
Is there a tag for "consensual infidelity" where the cheatee/cuck is not present? I would use consensual_cuckquean but she isn't present in the scene.Example: in this animation, Bandit mentions they're recording the sex as a video for his wife Chili. So it's not infidelity as it's not a violation of their relationship's rules, but also isn't cuckquean because she isn't visually present.
post #4944685
There's open_relationship but it's rarely used
cuckquean does mention that it still counts if the wife is watching remotely or after the fact. If the characters in the image explicitly say that she's going to watch it or is aware of it, then you could make an argument and just use cuckquean.
bluecollie55 said:
Hi. Excuse me please, I'm new here. Is there a tag for when a sexy looking character breaks through a wall/door/window, ect. I mean, you already have defenestration and autodefenestration for when a character crashes through a window. (Autodefenestration is when the character goes through the window on the character's own will.) you have already destruction though when I go through destruction I mostly get Macrofurs wrecking buildings and cities and the like.
No. Sadly there's no real word or tag equivalent of defenestration for walls/doors. I would suggest breaching but that seems to have been coopted for what whales/dolphins do when they break through the water's surface tension to come up for air.
nin10dope said:
No. Sadly there's no real word or tag equivalent of defenestration for walls/doors. I would suggest breaching but that seems to have been coopted for what whales/dolphins do when they break through the water's surface tension to come up for air.
Well, OK, thanks for your answer. Perhaps we should invent a new term for the tag of making destructive exits/entrances though walls/doors/ect? Perhaps I would suggest "destructive exit/entrance", "destructive breaching", "burst through X". What do you think?
akros_the_speeddemon said:
This one to me is a clear cut case of the uglification tag I propose. As you can see the penis is getting slowly more 'impure' and filthy with each docking session.
There is some cut clear cases where you can see beauty being stolen, or slowly assimilated away.
@Dba A Fish: I'm just asking "Do we have a tag for that?"
In a clear cut case where we can measure beauty / pristineliness in some form being: drained, transformed, infested, and/or corrupted.
There are definitely clear cut cases of this: But like I said, no proper classification.
And I think, for the longest time: e621 should have a classification and tag for this. Should say: A video similar in nature to the one I hyperlinked go into e621's records.
Yes, attractiveness is subjective, but we're looking not for subjectivity: We're looking for something less general than simply "attribute theft"; which is quickly getting too broad to encompass everything now.
I honestly feel that yes; we need, or eventually will need a specific classification. Case point is that it's probably occurred on multiple e621 posts already...
I am simply wishing an easier way to "find" such posts. Best way would be a tag, or a tag merge...
akros_the_speeddemon said:
@Dba A Fish:[...]
wha'd I have do to with this? I don't think I weighed in on this anywhere...
dba_afish said:
wha'd I have do to with this? I don't think I weighed in on this anywhere...
you were above their post, they must have mistaken you for watsit, who was the one they actually talked to
bluecollie55 said:
Well, OK, thanks for your answer. Perhaps we should invent a new term for the tag of making destructive exits/entrances though walls/doors/ect? Perhaps I would suggest "destructive exit/entrance", "destructive breaching", "burst through X". What do you think?
Try breaking_through
It's just general enough to cover all of the options you mentioned
I was thinking breakthrough but that's apparently a copyright tag for some game(?) and also a term similar to Eureka
nin10dope said:
Try breaking_through
It's just general enough to cover all of the options you mentioned
I was thinking breakthrough but that's apparently a copyright tag for some game(?) and also a term similar to Eureka
That may work. Thank you for your efforts.
Is there a tag for an image that has no background, like there is a portrait but the surrounding background is just the e6 colour?
adored said:
no background
Is there a tag for vore where the participants are related? (It'd be easier to blacklist that than blacklisting "vore ~siblings_(lore) ~parent_and_child_(lore)" and the dozens of other familial relationship tags.)
roxythehorny said:
Is there a tag for vore where the participants are related? (It'd be easier to blacklist that than blacklisting "vore ~siblings_(lore) ~parent_and_child_(lore)" and the dozens of other familial relationship tags.)
No
ecdce said:
transparent_background?
Ah yes the alpha channel thing
Hiya! Curious, is there a tag for socks that are only half on and are NOT in the process of being put on or removed?
Thinking of creating a wiki when I discover a few more, if its even worth it.
What is the tag for when a character has a big cartoony bite taken out of them?
Examples:
Do we have a tag for when bends in the large intestine are made straight because it's been penetrated by something long? I think the name rearranged_insides would work if that needs to be created.
Example:
Do we have a tag for furry characters who are only partially covered in fur?
This image, for instance, depicts an anthro who only has fur on their arms and legs, while their torso is bare skin. I've found bare_skin and shaved_fur but I don't know if they're the right tags for this.
beholding said:
Do we have a tag for furry characters who are only partially covered in fur?This image, for instance, depicts an anthro who only has fur on their arms and legs, while their torso is bare skin. I've found bare_skin and shaved_fur but I don't know if they're the right tags for this.
That example specifically I think is supposed to be a furry body, it just doesn't have very good fur definition. There's small tufts on the face and around the crotch, which is the same color and has no obvious separation from the main body. Even the feet and hands also have that same smooth outlining, only showing tufts where it separates from the main color.
But generally speaking, assuming something like there where it is skin, I think that would qualify for animal_humanoid instead of anthro, with <animal>_tail and possibly animal_head.