What tag is used for when the tail is parallel with the body, like in https://e621.net/posts/4928403?

abc-def said:

snedmano said:
(Vore related)

I don't think there is a tag for this yet, but it's probably still a good idea to ask.

I'm looking for a tag, where a prey (most likely with a visible bulge / outline) is moved/moving to a different part of the preds body.

Examples I could find:
post #3626560
post #2433882
post #3192801
post #3946016
post #2114354
post #5392973
post #1897435
post #4469158

(I'm not sure what I would call the tag, though, if it does not yet exist.)

I don't think so, not sure though. Should be created I think.

yeah, that's most likely the case.
If there was a tag, I should have found one in one of the examples I've listed.

I've thought about a few tag name ideas:

moving_prey

Probably too ambiguous. Could be easily misunderstood.

moving_prey_though_body

Less ambiguous, but a bit long.
Though by name alone, this could also mean a micro character moving though the body, which is not seen from the outside.

moving_bulge or bulge_travel

Currently leaning towards one of these two tags.
Could perhaps also be used for object_ingestion scenarios.

yeah, that's most likely the case.
If there was a tag, I should have found one in one of the examples I've listed.

I've thought about a few tag name ideas:

moving_prey

Probably too ambiguous. Could be easily misunderstood.

moving_prey_though_body

Less ambiguous, but a bit long.
Though by name alone, this could also mean a micro character moving though the body, which is not seen from the outside.

moving_bulge or bulge_travel

Currently leaning towards one of these two tags.
Could perhaps also be used for object_ingestion scenarios.

what about partial_tour ?

full_tour is a prey being moved completely from one end to the other, so what about partial tour as an in between?

Is there a tag for a flexible bottom rimming the top during anal? rimming_while_penetrated seems to be a completely useless tag that people are using for people being rimmed while getting oral. I couldn't actually find any images like this, though I vaguely remember seeing one in the past. Not really a 'realistic' position, though I'm assuming something like an otter or weasel or goo creature could do it without looking too awkward.

Is there a tag for when a man, behind or beneath a Futanari woman while penetrating her, is not just fucking her but also shoving her penis-first into another woman's vagina?

As if the middle futanari between the two was a condom for them.

The tag "missionary" redirects to missionary_position. Is there a tag for religious missionaries, like Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses who go door to door trying to convert people?

post #5248483 post #1369955

manitka said:
what about partial_tour ?

full_tour is a prey being moved completely from one end to the other, so what about partial tour as an in between?

partial_tour sounds like it would be a good fit. Neat idea!

Though I'm a bit unsure where to make the distinction then.
Would the "default" oral_vore scenario, where a character gets swallowed by another and ends up in their stomach count as partial_tour?

snedmano said:
partial_tour sounds like it would be a good fit. Neat idea!

Though I'm a bit unsure where to make the distinction then.
Would the "default" oral_vore scenario, where a character gets swallowed by another and ends up in their stomach count as partial_tour?

Some people will definitely interpret it that way, even if written otherwise in the wiki.
To exclude the entry, I think that moving_bulge and bulge_travel are better.

I have made research and didn't found anything for the following tags. Do we have tags for :

• when a picture is made of only one part. Not a comic, no cutaway, not multiple view on the same thing. For that I would imagine something like single_part_layout.
• when a picture is almost one part but accepting one or two cutaway. Something like one_part_focus.
• when a picture is made of multiple parts. Not only comic which always have a time relation between frames, but also including other multi parts pictures like expression_sheet, multiple_versions and others. Something like multi_part_layout.

I have put useful things I have found in tag_group:layout.
If you found those tags or I you have better tags name idea, tell me.

Also, do we have a tag for what I would call floating_layout ?
Those things : post #3434229, post #3458834, post #5399244, post #5365594.

Is the incubus tag separate from the demon tag?

abynth said:
What tag is used for when the tail is parallel with the body, like in https://e621.net/posts/4928403?

so far we've come up with tailbutt
https://e621.net/forum_topics/42705
it's the best we can think of and are open for a more proper name for it if anyone can think of one

shapie said:
Is the incubus tag separate from the demon tag?

Currently yes, but there's heated debate about it.

A while ago I asked if there's a tag for "One-woman threesomes like Cerberus from Helltaker".

I was misunderstood. It's my fault, sorry for being unclear.

I'm not talking about selfcest art where Rainbow Dash is screwing Rainbow Dash. It's not about the threesome.

I mean when multiple related people share the same mind, whether it's in a sexual context or not. Not just a psychic link where one sibling can feel what the other sibling is feeling, but when one mind/soul inhabits multiple bodies. Like Cerberus from Helltaker.

When there's a hive mind, but it's shared between related people.

beholding said:
Currently yes, but there's heated debate about it.

Thanks, mate.

Is there a tag I can use to blacklist human faces?
'humanoid_face' (https://e621.net/wiki_pages/6965) doesn't apply to humans/humanoids so it completely misses the point.

owlcore said:
Is there a tag I can use to blacklist human faces?
'humanoid_face' (https://e621.net/wiki_pages/6965) doesn't apply to humans/humanoids so it completely misses the point.

human -faceless_human
humanoid_face
animal_humanoid -animal_head -faceless_humanoid

that should catch just about everything

dba_afish said:

human -faceless_human
humanoid_face
animal_humanoid -animal_head -faceless_humanoid

that should catch just about everything

Thank you
Now if only people would tag things right...
We need to train a model to tag images.

Updated anti-human (face) blacklist:
human_penetrated
humanoid ~pointy_ears ~unusual_pupils ~headgear
animal_humanoid -scalie -animal_head -faceless_humanoid
humanoid_face
not_furry -robot -pokemon -alien
human_to_furry

Do we have a tag for changing rooms specifically on beaches? I've been seeing a lot of those tagged as dressing_room_(disambiguation), and I want to replace them with something more specific, but I can't find anything.

These images show what I'm talking about.

post #3250438 post #3371678 post #4703749

I may be missing something obvious, is there a way to search for larger than usual ferals, i.e. a rodent of unusual size (surprised ROUS is not a tag)? We have a few species-specific things like dire_wolf that are vaguely misused for any large wolf, but most species don't have that, and larger_* tags are in relation to another character, i.e. a regular-sized horse with a smaller but not below-regular-human-proportions anthro mouse. Can't figure out how to find, say, a solo ROUS that's the size of a rottweiler. If we're using macro for this, we shouldn't be. Also, bumping my last question:

kevsnowcat said:
Is there a tag for a flexible bottom rimming the top during anal? rimming_while_penetrated seems to be a completely useless tag that people are using for people being rimmed while getting oral. I couldn't actually find any images like this, though I vaguely remember seeing one in the past. Not really a 'realistic' position, though I'm assuming something like an otter or weasel or goo creature could do it without looking too awkward.

munchmallow-frosty said:
Do we have a tag for changing rooms specifically on beaches? I've been seeing a lot of those tagged as dressing_room_(disambiguation), and I want to replace them with something more specific, but I can't find anything.

These images show what I'm talking about.

post #3250438 post #3371678 post #4703749

I was working on cleaning up the "dressing_room" related tags, and unfortunately we don't seem to have one specifically for beach changing rooms. I was going to make a tag myself, but couldn't decide what it should be. Meant to post a discussion about it, but life happened and I forgot lol

munchmallow-frosty said:
Do we have a tag for changing rooms specifically on beaches? I've been seeing a lot of those tagged as dressing_room_(disambiguation), and I want to replace them with something more specific, but I can't find anything.

These images show what I'm talking about.

post #3250438 post #3371678 post #4703749

lust_demon_laz said:
I was working on cleaning up the "dressing_room" related tags, and unfortunately we don't seem to have one specifically for beach changing rooms. I was going to make a tag myself, but couldn't decide what it should be. Meant to post a discussion about it, but life happened and I forgot lol

In french it's "cabine de plage" : absolutely no ambiguity. In English we could say "beach hut" or "beach cabin" but both are ambiguous and include small houses on the beach.
The tag for using one should start with "in_". Otherwise just seeing one from outside would make them tagged.

Is there a tag to describe how the foreskin here hangs down? I thought about simply tagging it as long foreskin since it is but I am not sure.
post #5301877
Added more images for reference:
post #4369866 post #1235685 post #1643634 post #1987803 post #2302221 post #2885802

Is there a tag for when the drawn character is interacting with the screen you're viewing the drawing or animation in?

example: https://e621.net/posts/5431389?q=fav%3AMohitopaw

lil_zubat said:
Is there a tag to describe how the foreskin here hangs down? I thought about simply tagging it as long foreskin since it is but I am not sure.
post #5301877
Added more images for reference:
post #4369866 post #1235685 post #1643634 post #1987803 post #2302221 post #2885802

seems to be the closest match, but it's pretty badly underpopulated.

munchmallow-frosty said:
saggy_foreskin seems to be the closest match, but it's pretty badly underpopulated.

Thanks for the help!

mikael_the_d said:
Some people will definitely interpret it that way, even if written otherwise in the wiki.
To exclude the entry, I think that moving_bulge and bulge_travel are better.

Since there hasn't been any more discussion about this in the last week, I've went ahead and created a tag wiki for bulge_travel.
I'm a bit unsure if swallowing scenarios with a noticeable bulge should be included, but I'm leaning more towards yes, since it wouldn't be clear from the name alone.

munchmallow-frosty said:
Do we have a tag for changing rooms specifically on beaches? I've been seeing a lot of those tagged as dressing_room_(disambiguation), and I want to replace them with something more specific, but I can't find anything.

These images show what I'm talking about.

post #3250438 post #3371678 post #4703749

mikael_the_d said:
In french it's "cabine de plage" : absolutely no ambiguity. In English we could say "beach hut" or "beach cabin" but both are ambiguous and include small houses on the beach.
The tag for using one should start with "in_". Otherwise just seeing one from outside would make them tagged.

beach_hut is indeed a tag we have; there are so few posts with it rn that it's not really an issue if it's used for both interiors and exteriors.

snedmano said:
Since there hasn't been any more discussion about this in the last week, I've went ahead and created a tag wiki for bulge_travel.
I'm a bit unsure if swallowing scenarios with a noticeable bulge should be included, but I'm leaning more towards yes, since it wouldn't be clear from the name alone.

Thanks!
Now all we need to do is tag

"uglification"? - where a person, object, body part, etc. is transformed to be "more ugly".
"ugly"? - Where a character is intentionally made slightly, or just unattractive, as per the artists wishes (Not to be confused with ugly_bastard), would finally make the tag valid.
"reversed_animation"? - for any third party edit where the video / animation starts out forward-wise, then reverses, or is simply a 3rd party edit where it is reversed.
"Punk_Baphomet"? - Example 1? example 2 Example 3 - When the deity / species variants of baphomet are dressed punk-like or gothic-punk like in their attire, usually emitting a rebellious "stick it to the man" response to authority, and a taunting/care free attitude in most cases.

akros_the_speeddemon said:
"uglification"? - where a person, object, body part, etc. is transformed to be "more ugly".
"ugly"? - Where a character is intentionally made slightly, or just unattractive, as per the artists wishes (Not to be confused with ugly_bastard), would finally make the tag valid.

"Ugly" is subjective. Like pretty, cute, and similar tags which have been invalidated for being too subjective. What one person finds ugly, another may find pretty or cute, and vice-versa.

akros_the_speeddemon said:

"Punk_Baphomet"? - Example 1? example 2 Example 3 - When the deity / species variants of baphomet are dressed punk-like or gothic-punk like in their attire, usually emitting a rebellious "stick it to the man" response to authority, and a taunting/care free attitude in most cases.

punk /alternative_fashion + baphomet_(deity) should bring up some stuff (https://e621.net/posts?tags=alternative_fashion+baphomet_%28deity%29)

might try also goat_demon instead because the baphomet species was aliased to goat_demon (https://e621.net/posts?page=2&tags=goat_demon+alternative_fashion+)

not a whole lot of hits but there might be more untagged

Oh, this one’s been slightly bothering me because I have no idea how to describe it. You know how anthro and feral characters with very, very short hind legs will stand up on them, and they have that cute floof about their legs? Almost like a webbing of sort like between human pointer fingers and thumbs, that sort of extra filling. That, but between the legs of the characters. I have no idea what that is, and it seems to have no tags for it besides sometimes being identified as “short_legs”. I don’t know animal anatomy enough to suggest something better though, but it is something that is very noticeable when you see it. Some example posts that feature this bit of anatomy:

https://e621.net/posts/5037330
https://e621.net/posts/4251899
https://e621.net/posts/3325661 < this one especially

It’s like, their hips are much lower or something? I have no idea. Thanks for reading lol

Wondering if there's a tag for when a character has sex with a partner who doesn't quite understand what's happening to them- someone on a different level of intelligence or experience to the one initiating, such as a younger character or a pet. The receiving character might show a little bit of hesitation, confusion, or maybe eventually they're into it. The important thing is they're confused about the act, while the dominant partner is certainly not.

I've tried "naive" but that doesn't quite carry the same vibe. "Confused" tag mostly shows characters with floating ?'s and looking inquisitive, but it is not specific to sexual acts being inflicted on the uninformed. Certainly has overlap in "rape", but nothing to narrow it down.

In real life the equivalent would be taking advantage or grooming, but I see those tags don't exist or have other purposes, respectively.

Examples:
https://e621.net/posts/4427143?q=toast_%28r3drunner%29
https://e621.net/posts/1921268?q=parent%3A1921268
https://e621.net/posts/3964964

Strongly implied in this post and it's child post:
https://e621.net/posts/3835518?q=parent%3A3835518
https://e621.net/posts/3835519?q=parent%3A3835518

horsecockforscale said:
Wondering if there's a tag for when a character has sex with a partner who doesn't quite understand what's happening to them- someone on a different level of intelligence or experience to the one initiating, such as a younger character or a pet. The receiving character might show a little bit of hesitation, confusion, or maybe eventually they're into it. The important thing is they're confused about the act, while the dominant partner is certainly not.

I've tried "naive" but that doesn't quite carry the same vibe. "Confused" tag mostly shows characters with floating ?'s and looking inquisitive, but it is not specific to sexual acts being inflicted on the uninformed. Certainly has overlap in "rape", but nothing to narrow it down.

In real life the equivalent would be taking advantage or grooming, but I see those tags don't exist or have other purposes, respectively.

Examples:
https://e621.net/posts/4427143?q=toast_%28r3drunner%29
https://e621.net/posts/1921268?q=parent%3A1921268
https://e621.net/posts/3964964

Strongly implied in this post and it's child post:
https://e621.net/posts/3835518?q=parent%3A3835518
https://e621.net/posts/3835519?q=parent%3A3835518

Maybe “unaware”.

red_fox_171 said:
Maybe “unaware”.

oblivious sex would be much better, though
oblivious rating:e ~duo ~group would allow more results

red_fox_171 said:
Oh, this one’s been slightly bothering me because I have no idea how to describe it. You know how anthro and feral characters with very, very short hind legs will stand up on them, and they have that cute floof about their legs? Almost like a webbing of sort like between human pointer fingers and thumbs, that sort of extra filling. That, but between the legs of the characters. I have no idea what that is, and it seems to have no tags for it besides sometimes being identified as “short_legs”. I don’t know animal anatomy enough to suggest something better though, but it is something that is very noticeable when you see it. Some example posts that feature this bit of anatomy:

https://e621.net/posts/5037330
https://e621.net/posts/4251899
https://e621.net/posts/3325661 < this one especially

It’s like, their hips are much lower or something? I have no idea. Thanks for reading lol

well, i searched for this, and i guess there isnt a tag. i grabbed some posts that do the thing you said, copied the tags, and compared them so i see the ones more repeated.
i came to the conclusion that you could use the race tags i think, like mustelid or marten along with negatives of anthro and animal humanoid.
I got two searches but i dont know if they will work exactly like you wanted, but might give it a shot:
1) (39 posts) biped -anthro rating:safe order:score -video solo mammal mustelid -anthro
2) (112 posts) marten order:tagcount solo -anthro -animal_humanoid -2_heads rating:safe

xx_gameslayer_xx said:
well, i searched for this, and i guess there isnt a tag. i grabbed some posts that do the thing you said, copied the tags, and compared them so i see the ones more repeated.
i came to the conclusion that you could use the race tags i think, like mustelid or marten along with negatives of anthro and animal humanoid.
I got two searches but i dont know if they will work exactly like you wanted, but might give it a shot:
1) (39 posts) biped -anthro rating:safe order:score -video solo mammal mustelid -anthro
2) (112 posts) marten order:tagcount solo -anthro -animal_humanoid -2_heads rating:safe

Thanks

horsecockforscale said:
Wondering if there's a tag for when a character has sex with a partner who doesn't quite understand what's happening to them- someone on a different level of intelligence or experience to the one initiating, such as a younger character or a pet. The receiving character might show a little bit of hesitation, confusion, or maybe eventually they're into it. The important thing is they're confused about the act, while the dominant partner is certainly not.

I've tried "naive" but that doesn't quite carry the same vibe. "Confused" tag mostly shows characters with floating ?'s and looking inquisitive, but it is not specific to sexual acts being inflicted on the uninformed. Certainly has overlap in "rape", but nothing to narrow it down.

In real life the equivalent would be taking advantage or grooming, but I see those tags don't exist or have other purposes, respectively.

Examples:
https://e621.net/posts/4427143?q=toast_%28r3drunner%29
https://e621.net/posts/1921268?q=parent%3A1921268
https://e621.net/posts/3964964

Strongly implied in this post and it's child post:
https://e621.net/posts/3835518?q=parent%3A3835518
https://e621.net/posts/3835519?q=parent%3A3835518

I made a set to collect posts like these while cleaning up the virgin tag. I can make you a maintainer if you'd like. Currently I'm still trying to figure out what would be a good tag. We currently have:

• oblivious
• oblivious_sexualization
• oblivious_sex
• naive
• innocence (which really ought to be invalidated like innocent is)
• child_grooming
• sexual_awakening (but this can be difficult to tag objectively)

Of those, I think naive probably fits the best, but the tag is also used for non-sexual situations. "Oblivious" can work for some situations, but I feel the word is too strong for others. I interpret "oblivious" to mean someone is completely unaware of what's happening, which feels weird in situations where someone's directly interacting with them. oblivious_sexualization and oblivious_sex could work, but don't have a lot of examples at the moment.

red_fox_171 said:
Maybe “unaware”.

snpthecat said:
oblivious sex would be much better, though
oblivious rating:e ~duo ~group would allow more results

"Unaware"/"Oblivious" to me sounds like it should mean the character doesn't know something is happening, rather than being aware something is happening but don't know/understand what it is. "Naive" would be a better term for that.

watsit said:
"Unaware"/"Oblivious" to me sounds like it should mean the character doesn't know something is happening, rather than being aware something is happening but don't know/understand what it is. "Naive" would be a better term for that.

Yeah, this.

Relatedly, do we/should we have a separate tag for characters being ignorant of their bodily functions, like thinking semen is pee?

ETA: Just found post #4721523, where a character is mind controlled into not realizing they're performing sexual acts. It's tagged as oblivious_sexualization, which I think is accurate, but it feels distinct from the situation described upthread.

ETA2: Oh, we also have naive_sex. But like naive, it has no wiki page delineating the difference from oblivious. I think we ought to disentangle these.

Do we have anything similiar to a "Stream of conciousness" tag, where the character's internal monologue is shown as one huge wall of text or several rapid thoughts? Similar to these:

post #4484572
post #4333961
post #4240417

Obviously "Thoughts" covers this but these examples are obviously a little more intense than just a series of internal thoughts, it's the only thing the character is internalising at the moment.

Any chance we can get a tag for bottoms rimming a top? When you search rimming it's mostly tops rimming bottoms and it'd be nice to have a tag to filter those out. Speaking of course of gay

Do we have a tag for solid-color fur? No markings, no countershade, just a single color all over.

lendrimujina said:
Do we have a tag for solid-color fur? No markings, no countershade, just a single color all over.

Monotone_fur

I haven't been able to find a tag for a realistic ejaculation. Like normal amount of cum and not a garden hose like most furry porn.

beholding said:
I made a set to collect posts like these while cleaning up the virgin tag. I can make you a maintainer if you'd like. Currently I'm still trying to figure out what would be a good tag. We currently have:

• oblivious
• oblivious_sexualization
• oblivious_sex
• naive
• innocence (which really ought to be invalidated like innocent is)
• child_grooming
• sexual_awakening (but this can be difficult to tag objectively)

Of those, I think naive probably fits the best, but the tag is also used for non-sexual situations. "Oblivious" can work for some situations, but I feel the word is too strong for others. I interpret "oblivious" to mean someone is completely unaware of what's happening, which feels weird in situations where someone's directly interacting with them. oblivious_sexualization and oblivious_sex could work, but don't have a lot of examples at the moment.

That's about the same issues I have with those tags- they're just too general to encompass this very specific situation on their own. Child_grooming is very specific though and I will keep that tag in mind!

I'd be happy to help add things to the set! Would you like me to dm you when I add a post in case you don't think it fits? I've got a couple ideas of posts to add already.

horsecockforscale said:
I'd be happy to help add things to the set! Would you like me to dm you when I add a post in case you don't think it fits? I've got a couple ideas of posts to add already.

The set is pretty loosey-goosey by nature, so I don't think that's necessary. Have fun with it.

How about if your character's fur forms a natural skirt? Such as Braixen's design where it fans out at or around the hips
There is fur_skirt but it's basically dead with 7 or so posts and some are for a literal skirt made of fur

nin10dope said:
How about if your character's fur forms a natural skirt? Such as Braixen's design where it fans out at or around the hips
There is fur_skirt but it's basically dead with 7 or so posts and some are for a literal skirt made of fur

There's pseudo_skirt, and the more general pseudo_clothing.

Is there a tag for when someone is into humans?

sorrowless said:
Is there a tag for when someone is into humans?

human_fetish

watsit said:
"Ugly" is subjective. Like pretty, cute, and similar tags which have been invalidated for being too subjective. What one person finds ugly, another may find pretty or cute, and vice-versa.

This one to me is a clear cut case of the uglification tag I propose. As you can see the penis is getting slowly more 'impure' and filthy with each docking session.
There is some cut clear cases where you can see beauty being stolen, or slowly assimilated away.

dba_afish said:
human_fetish

Thanks! I’ll get right to tagging

Do we have a tag for the bags hanging from lucario's head?