The tag alias #78063 black_person -> dark_skin is pending approval.

Reason: its related to dark_skin tag, as seen by how dark-skinned_human and other related tags are also aliased to Dark skin

Just went into Post-Changes and jeez a lot of specific users really love using that tag instead of dark_skin

nin10dope said:
Just went into Post-Changes and jeez a lot of specific users really love using that tag instead of dark_skin

oh yea, that kinda weird ngl

The bulk update request #11631 is pending approval.

create alias african_american (0) -> invalid_tag (0)
create alias person_of_color (77) -> invalid_tag (0)

Reason: alias 1 that tag has no posts
alias 2 that tag has posts but inconsistent in tagging

funkwolfie said:
The bulk update request #11631 is pending approval.

create alias african_american (0) -> invalid_tag (0)
create alias person_of_color (77) -> invalid_tag (0)

Reason: alias 1 that tag has no posts
alias 2 that tag has posts

Not the last one, looked through its uses and it's all over the place, including furry-only characters and people who just aren't dark

nin10dope said:
Not the last one, looked through its uses and it's all over the place, including furry-only characters and people who just aren't dark

would it be best to invalid that one also?
(edited the bur)

Sorry for all the issues with my burs im trying my best

funkwolfie said:
would it be best to invalid that one also?
(edited the bur)

Sorry for all the issues with my burs im trying my best

No worries, it's a learning curve we all have to get through

nin10dope said:
No worries, it's a learning curve we all have to get through

dumb question obv i realize I should check anytags I can think of when im doing burs, but i assume its best practice if lets say I have 5 burs request (tags are not similar in each request like requesta: could be genitals requestb: could be type of hair. etc etc) that I should make one bur request and put the next 4 in the same forum and change the forum title to "alot of burs request" (something similar)

or should I just make 5 indivuial threads for it? cause i assume burs should only contain tags that are related so don't put dick changes and hair changes in same bur

funkwolfie said:
dumb question obv i realize I should check anytags I can think of when im doing burs, but i assume its best practice if lets say I have 5 burs request (tags are not similar in each request like requesta: could be genitals requestb: could be type of hair. etc etc) that I should make one bur request and put the next 4 in the same forum and change the forum title to "alot of burs request" (something similar)

or should I just make 5 indivuial threads for it? cause i assume burs should only contain tags that are related so don't put dick changes and hair changes in same bur

As long as they're all related to a theme, they can all be in a single BUR
They should only be broken up if:

• They hit the maximum line count (25)
• If you get the antecedent error, which means that a simultaneous request is calling that target (can't request an alias to something that's also getting a request)
• Community sentiment that some of the requests are good but others are not. (if everyone can agree on 1-7 but not on 8-10)
• If they're completely unrelated (ideally unrelated things should have their own separate Forum Topic but sometimes we squeeze similar things together for compression)

funkwolfie said:
The bulk update request #11631 is pending approval.

create alias african_american (0) -> invalid_tag (0)
create alias person_of_color (77) -> invalid_tag (0)

Reason: alias 1 that tag has no posts
alias 2 that tag has posts but inconsistent in tagging

These could probably be disambiguated rather than completely thrown out, they should theoretically have some valid replacements

donovan_dmc said:
These could probably be disambiguated rather than completely thrown out, they should theoretically have some valid replacements

African American can go to dark_skin but person of color is a complete mess and not worth saving

nin10dope said:
African American can go to dark_skin but person of color is a complete mess and not worth saving

okay updated

funkwolfie said:
okay updated

Yeah no. There's a wide enough range of colors and shades that this won't inherently apply. Not to mention if it's an animal character that's either a furrification or intended to be read as African American.

regsmutt said:
Yeah no. There's a wide enough range of colors and shades that this won't inherently apply. Not to mention if it's an animal character that's either a furrification or intended to be read as African American.

1: that really doesnt apply cause there was already no posts on this tag so that why I orginally was going to invalid it but dmc said not to
2:we tag what we see, so if it a furry you wouldnt tag it as such cause it wouldnt apply

See topic #57394 for related discussion around black_coded.

beholding said:
See topic #57394 for related discussion around black_coded.

the only way that is related is that refers to black people but that tag is about stereotypes not the actual skin color }
we are referring to humans not sterotypes for fur having creatures, only reg brought this up and even that wasnt even valid

but there I re-invalidated african american, that way no tries to play the stereotype card again