The bulk update request #6221 is pending approval.

create implication teal_pubes (11) -> pubes (128933)
create implication two_tone_pubes (23) -> multicolored_pubes (22)
create implication rainbow_pubes (34) -> multicolored_pubes (22)
create implication multicolored_pubes (22) -> pubes (128933)

Reason: teal pubes must've gotten missed in the tealpocalypse a little while ago, the various multicolored ones are also missing.

Downvoting this only for including two tone/rainbow/etc. We don't need numbered color tags for every little thing out there.

donovan_dmc said:
Downvoting this only for including two tone/rainbow/etc. We don't need numbered color tags for every little thing out there.

I would honestly be fine with aliasing every two_tone_* tag to multicolored_* bc I don't think they provide that much utility, but do I think the rainbow_* tags are helpful.

upvoted because teal_pubes -> pubes. Unsure about if it's really necessary to implicate rainbow_pubes to multicolored_pubes or just rainbow pubes -> pubes. I just don't know if this is the best way to do that. Same for two_tone. why not just implicate pubes?

hjfduitloxtrds said:
Unsure about if it's really necessary to implicate rainbow_pubes to multicolored_pubes or just rainbow pubes -> pubes. I just don't know if this is the best way to do that. Same for two_tone. why not just implicate pubes?

Because that's how all other two_tone_* and rainbow_* tags currently work. I agree two_tone_* and multicolored_* should probably be overhauled at some point, but this BUR is consistent with how they're currently done.

cloudpie said:
Because that's how all other two_tone_* and rainbow_* tags currently work. I agree two_tone_* and multicolored_* should probably be overhauled at some point, but this BUR is consistent with how they're currently done.

hmm good point. +1 for consistency. I like consistency.

The tag really should be pubic_hair: topic #39046.