The tag alias #63531 naked_female -> nude_female has been approved.

Reason: Synonyms, no reason both of these tags should exist, nude_female has 4k+ posts, naked_female is in single digits.

EDIT: The tag alias naked_female -> nude_female (forum #372485) has been approved by @spe.

Are we gonna have tags for all levels of clothed/nudity for all genders?

cloudpie said:
Are we gonna have tags for all levels of clothed/nudity for all genders?

I don't see why not, I think it's kinda like <gender/form>_penetrated <gender/form>_penetrating

Naked definition's difference from nudity wouldn't likely pass TWYS tests, anyways...

I'm not even in a position to handle yet another tagging project, Cloudpie and m3g4p0n1. I wonder who will volunteer, hehe.

bump

bump

topic #44585
Also @Cinder why'd you oppose it

Considering how much nude gets mistagged, I can see opposing this just for the amount of extra work these subtags create. Trying to manually untag nude only to see it instantly reappear due to who knows which implication is a major timesink, and from what I remember, the naked -> nude implication is major cause of mistags.

...really need some automatic untagging feature, where if you untag nude (or humanoid or whatever), it'll also kill the entire chain of tags that imply it.

genjar said:
...really need some automatic untagging feature, where if you untag nude (or humanoid or whatever), it'll also kill the entire chain of tags that imply it.

That would be an issue with people removing an implied tag they don't think applies, but actually does. e.g. someone removing bestiality because the image is anthro_on_feral and they think it should only be tagged for human_on_feral. Implications help tags stay when they apply, but a feature like that would result in more valid tags being removed from posts due to taking out the whole chain.

genjar said:
Considering how much nude gets mistagged, I can see opposing this just for the amount of extra work these subtags create. Trying to manually untag nude only to see it instantly reappear due to who knows which implication is a major timesink, and from what I remember, the naked -> nude implication is major cause of mistags.

Barring aside the issue of implication chains, I feel that having clothed/nude_* subtags are a good compromise considering we nuked the double-double combo tags recently (see topic #43781).

watsit said:
That would be an issue with people removing an implied tag they don't think applies, but actually does. e.g. someone removing bestiality because the image is anthro_on_feral and they think it should only be tagged for human_on_feral. Implications help tags stay when they apply, but a feature like that would result in more valid tags being removed from posts due to taking out the whole chain.

Certainly. I was thinking that it'd be limited to Privileged+, like other similar tools.

The tag alias naked_female -> nude_female (forum #372485) has been approved by @spe.