The tag alias #57225 receiving_pov -> bottom_pov has been rejected.

Reason: As far as I can tell these are used interchangeably
EDIT: checked the official definition and receiving poverty even directly referee to it as the poverty of a bottom

EDIT: The tag alias receiving_pov -> bottom_pov (forum #332144) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

wedler said:
EDIT: checked the official definition and receiving poverty even directly referee to it as the poverty of a bottom

autocorrect is cruel

wedler said:
The tag alias #57225 receiving_pov -> bottom_pov has been rejected.

Reason: As far as I can tell these are used interchangeably
EDIT: checked the official definition and receiving poverty even directly referee to it as the poverty of a bottom

I'm not sure receiving is the same as bottom. That is a gay male exclusive definition as far as I know.

It says in some cases receiving will be the bottom of a gay male relationship.

wedler said:
The tag alias #57225 receiving_pov -> bottom_pov has been rejected.

Reason: As far as I can tell these are used interchangeably

post #930237
Directly referenced in the wiki, this image is receiving_pov and top_pov.

EDIT: checked the official definition and receiving pov even directly refers to it as the pov of a bottom

No, it doesn't. It says "Bottom in some cases", not "always the bottom". I've gone ahead and edited it to be more clear about it.

While we are on the subject of receiving_pov, I would appreciate it if you guys could also give your thoughts on the penetrated_pov -> receiving_pov implication here.

The tag alias receiving_pov -> bottom_pov (forum #332144) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.