The bulk update request #504 is active.

Reason: Various aliases/implications for scar tags. Derived from topic #22746.

• Since these tags seem to be synonymous with each other, I'm de-implicating scar_across_eye/scar_over_eye from eye_scar so that they can then be aliased to eye_scar in a subsequent BUR.
• I also noticed several tags like face_scar and scarred_eye still appear when searching the 'Tags' section, despite currently being aliased to facial_scar and eye_scar.

Edit:

• Removed the alias stomach_scar -> belly_scar.
• Removed the implications belly_scar -> belly/scar and c-section_scar -> belly_scar.

EDIT: The bulk update request #504 (forum #301578) has been approved by @Millcore.

I would like to suggest changing create alias stomach_scar -> belly_scar to create alias stomach_scar -> abdomen_scar for the reasons given by @Watsit in topic #28134

I looked through the discussion on that forum topic. That seems like something for a forum discussion. I'll start a forum topic to discuss this subject, but I'll move that alias to the 'Tags For Another BUR' section for the time being.

d.d.m. said:

• Since these tags seem to be synonymous with each other, I'm de-implicating scar_across_eye/scar_over_eye from eye_scar so that they can then be aliased to eye_scar in a subsequent BUR.

I was wondering who made these implications and it turned out to be me

I meant for those to be aliases but I guess I accidentally did implications and nobody else noticed either.

d.d.m. said:
I looked through the discussion on that forum topic. That seems like something for a forum discussion. I'll start a forum topic to discuss this subject, but I'll move that alias to the 'Tags For Another BUR' section for the time being.

May want to remove create implication c-section_scar -> belly_scar and create implication belly_scar -> belly too (since belly currently relies on having an enlarged belly, as in being chubby or overweight, while a c-section scar doesn't and would end up mistagging posts with belly).

I removed those implications, along with the belly_scar -> scar implication for the time being until standardizing the abdomen/belly/stomach/torso tags is figured out. I set up a forum topic to discuss this subject at topic #28147.

faucet said:
I was wondering who made these implications and it turned out to be me

I meant for those to be aliases but I guess I accidentally did implications and nobody else noticed either.

Oh. Whoops. I was definitely one who missed the part about those being implications. It just seemed so logically meant to be an alias that I didn't even to stop to question it. At least it can still be fixed.

The bulk update request #504 (forum #301578) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #751 is active.

create alias belly_scar (0) -> abdominal_scar (654)
create alias stomach_scar (0) -> abdominal_scar (654)
create alias scar_on_butt (0) -> butt_scar (142)
create alias scar_across_eye (0) -> eye_scar (12812)
create alias scar_over_eye (0) -> eye_scar (12812)
create alias scar_on_muzzle (0) -> snout_scar (562)
create alias scar_on_snout (0) -> snout_scar (562)
create implication abdominal_scar (654) -> scar (89663)
create implication butt_scar (142) -> butt (1099464)
create implication butt_scar (142) -> scar (89663)
create implication c-section_scar (65) -> scar (89663)

Reason: Additional scar tags, and some additional edits made based on feedback from the previous BUR.

• Since abdomen_scar could be confused with scars on an arthropod_abdomen, the belly_scar and stomach_scar tags are aliasing to abdominal_scar instead.

EDIT: The bulk update request #751 (forum #306553) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The bulk update request #751 (forum #306553) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.