JAKXXX3 said:
Just created the v-cut tag for that distinctive muscle shape below the abs.

That's called the Adonis belt.

leomole said:
That's called the Adonis belt.

I mentioned that in the wiki description, there are several different names used for it. If think that one of them would be more suited as the main tag name, you could make an alias suggestion. Then again, you could also just transfer it manually, since it hasn't been tagged much yet.

I'm making naked_collar a tag, since there are many posts featuring characters wearing nothing but a collar.

holding_fixture - When a character is holding a fixed object.

post #1356143post #710851

BlueDingo said:
holding_fixture - When a character is holding a fixed object.

post #1356143post #710851

Does this relate to your post in the hanging_from_branch implication thread?

BlueDingo said:
One way we could do this is sort images into the following three tags:

• Character holding themselves up: dangling, since hanging can't be used.
• Character held up by another character: carrying.
• Character held up by bondage of some kind: suspension.

That is, should those dangling images also include holding_fixture?

Should we add <gender>_on_<bodytype> in general or just for _on_feral and _on_anthro?

Some taur/human images are getting tagged female_on_anthro which is weird but there's nothing to replace it with.

MatrixMash said:
Does this relate to your post in the hanging_from_branch implication thread?

That is, should those dangling images also include holding_fixture?

I suppose it can. Dangling from a fixed object usually involves holding it.

post #135771

_{^{Random question: Why do we only have four monkey_bars images?[/sub]}}

BlueDingo said:
I suppose it can. Dangling from a fixed object usually involves holding it.

post #135771

_{^{Random question: Why do we only have four monkey_bars images?[/sub]}}

what about from legs? Or if the subject is being held by what they are dangling from?

kamimatsu said:
what about from legs? Or if the subject is being held by what they are dangling from?

Hence the word "usually", and the latter would either be suspension or require you to be above the fixture.

I see we now have a pokémon_(species) tag, meaning I don't need set #8099 anymore.

BlueDingo said:
I see we now have a pokémon_(species) tag, meaning I don't need set #8099 anymore.

I'm glad the tag exists now, it'll make it easier to search for and seperate between images with the species in them and just images with a pokemon theme with no species

still needs a bit of work tho, as it seems as of now only gen 1 pokemon are implicated to it. tho it's understandable; it probably takes a long time to imply them all to it to begin with

facelessmess said:
I'm glad the tag exists now, it'll make it easier to search for and seperate between images with the species in them and just images with a pokemon theme with no species

That was the purpose of that set. Now it's useless and will be deleted soon.

facelessmess said:
still needs a bit of work tho, as it seems as of now only gen 1 pokemon are implicated to it. tho it's understandable; it probably takes a long time to imply them all to it to begin with

With around 800 tags to imply, it certainly will take some time.

BlueDingo said:
With around 800 tags to imply, it certainly will take some time.

yep, not disagreeing with u there

speaking of which, a lot of pokemon tags still do need work with many missing legendary pokemon implications and the like. tho that's off topic from this specific forum, so i wont go any further than a mention here

I wonder how long it will be until digimon gets the same treatment?

BlueDingo said:
I wonder how long it will be until digimon gets the same treatment?

I would guess it might take a while longer, since pokemon's popularity and general large amount of content warranted this treatment more heavily compared to digimon

not to say digimon isnt popular or in need of it of course, I'm more talking in term of comparitives. hopefully wont be as long tbh; really tho a lot of digimon tags need tending to; a lot of them are missing digimon implications, such as many species outright not having any. hopefully in the near future it'll be cleaned up

BlueDingo said:
Hence the word "usually", and the latter would either be suspension or require you to be above the fixture.

BlueDingo said:
Hence the word "usually", and the latter would either be suspension or require you to be above the fixture.

I mean

BlueDingo said:
Hence the word "usually", and the latter would either be suspension or require you to be above the fixture.

Suspension is listed on the wiki as bondage. I'm talking more like a single part, like one limb, caught on something and just that part being held in place. The rest of the body basically would be free if not for that one part that isn't.

kamimatsu said:
Suspension is listed on the wiki as bondage. I'm talking more like a single part, like one limb, caught on something and just that part being held in place. The rest of the body basically would be free if not for that one part that isn't.

I suppose hooked would cover situations like that, but that's not a tag yet.

facelessmess said:
I'm glad the tag exists now, it'll make it easier to search for and seperate between images with the species in them and just images with a pokemon theme with no species

still needs a bit of work tho, as it seems as of now only gen 1 pokemon are implicated to it. tho it's understandable; it probably takes a long time to imply them all to it to begin with

dude give me more than a couple hours

Ratte said:
dude give me more than a couple hours

ah apologies if i came off as rude! i know it's a lot of work really, i was mainly just talking aloud, but sometimes i can come off as blunt and rude and not realize it because of personal social issues ahaha. my bad and my apologies! keep up the good work and thanks for the useful tag

assisted_bathing - When one character is bathing another.

I'm not the one to introduce this, it was there before but lightly used. But, vilous for anything that's part of the vilous universe.

I'm not sure what class of tag it should be (between general and copyright), but i'm leaning general, since there's no specific work(s) of fiction upon which its based. You could say the webcomic is the source, but that's a tough ideological stretch, it's more the other way around (because the webcomic is years younger than the vilous universe as a whole, sergals and stuff have been around for ages)

side_mouth - When a character's mouth is drawn towards the side of their face.

post #1202753

Made an erune species tag after looking into post #1298703 (relevant, forum #248687)

I noticed that some posts feature hats that accommodate the large ears anthros typically have through the use of ear-holes. Should there be a tag (like ear_hat) for these types of hats?
Tail_clothing already exists as a specific subset of the furgonomics tag for clothing that accommodates tails, so there is precedent for this kind of thing.
post #1407942 post #1237378 post #1231274

JAKXXX3 said:
I noticed that some posts feature hats that accommodate the large ears anthros typically have through the use of ear-holes. Should there be a tag (like ear_hat) for these types of hats?
Tail_clothing already exists as a specific subset of the furgonomics tag for clothing that accommodates tails, so there is precedent for this kind of thing.
post #1407942 post #1237378 post #1231274

YES PLZ.

*started the tail_button_bottoms tag, once upon a time* (which is the WORST name in the world, but it fit a bit better before someone redefined the tag from my specific meaning to a broad meaning. The redefinition isn't necessarily bad, but it does make hte name worse.

ear_hat makes me think of like, micky mouse ears on a hat. So... . ear-hole_hat? Hat_with_ear_holes? Hat_for_furries? Furry_designed_hat?

Should it also be for thigns like hoodies? they also need furgonomics post #182169

Headwear_with_ear_holes? Ear_slots? Furry_approved_headwear? Designed_with_ears_in_mind? Non-ear-crushing-headwear-designed-by-furries-for-furries?

edit: Oh,. this should probably have been in the 'do we have a tag for that' thread instead :/

JAKXXX3 said:
I noticed that some posts feature hats that accommodate the large ears anthros typically have through the use of ear-holes. Should there be a tag (like ear_hat) for these types of hats?
Tail_clothing already exists as a specific subset of the furgonomics tag for clothing that accommodates tails, so there is precedent for this kind of thing.
post #1407942 post #1237378 post #1231274

forum #229470

BlueDingo said:
forum #229470

There's some neat ideas, but it seems like they didn't reach a conclusion on it.

JAKXXX3 said:
There's some neat ideas, but it seems like they didn't reach a conclusion on it.

Yeah, the thread kinda died off without concluding. At least it links the sets I created to make up for the lack of suitable tags.

There are a few posts tagged abdl. I feel like this is a pretty good tag (potential for search and blacklisting) and thought of trying to make a wiki and tag some more posts with it. You guys think it's a good tag?

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
There are a few posts tagged abdl. I feel like this is a pretty good tag (potential for search and blacklisting) and thought of trying to make a wiki and tag some more posts with it. You guys think it's a good tag?

(e621 wiki doesn't have definition for ABDL, had to check Wikipedia)

I don't have a strong opinion, but why not have adult_baby and diaper as separate tags?

Checked for existing *baby* tags:

babying (no wiki)
which revealed ageplay, which is for all age_play including...

infantilism "...fetish involving roleplaying as an infant or child..."
"The following tags are aliased to this tag: babyfur, ab/dl, babyfurs, diaperfurs, diaperfur, ..."

So turns out e621 already has more established ABDL tag, but it is "ab/dl" and it alises to infantilism.

More *baby* tags:

• babyplay (2 uploads) {change to babyfur?}
• baby_play (one upload) {change to babyfur?}

(offtopic: babymaking, what the?! *sigh* 1 upload, showing Red XIII an alien feral (male) and human (female), so (in my opinion) unlikely to create a baby. )

Intravenous_drip, pretty self-explanatory.
post #1357347 post #1374736 post #1444320

Banner_image, to separate images that feature a banner object from images that take of the banner image format (short and wide, intended for the top visual element for websites and profiles).
post #21767 post #1471794 post #1462856

JAKXXX3 said:
Banner_image, to separate images that feature a banner object from images that take of the banner image format (short and wide, intended for the top visual element for websites and profiles).
post #21767 post #1471794 post #1462856

Yeah, I suppose that could be useful. Searching for ratio:>2.8 finds similar ratio, but those are mostly sequences and such.

_{(Noticed that ratio:>2.8 -sequence -multiple_poses -group would be a good tagging project. Most of those are missing something.)}

Genjar said:
_{(Noticed that ratio:>2.8 -sequence -multiple_poses -group would be a good tagging project. Most of those are missing something.)}

You could also use a similar search to fix mistagged lineup posts, as they are typically short and wide images.

I'm thinking about making anal_weightlifting, vaginal_weightlifting, and penile_weightlifting tags. These seem to be particular fetishes (except for the lattermost, but it's not out of the realm of possibility), so having a tag for them may be useful.

post #1473008 anal weightlifting, the most common
post #1414681 penile weightlifting, unsurprisingly only 1 post
(No thumbnail) vaginal weightlifting, but I know it exists.

Siral_Exan said:
I'm thinking about making anal_weightlifting, vaginal_weightlifting, and penile_weightlifting tags. These seem to be particular fetishes (except for the lattermost, but it's not out of the realm of possibility), so having a tag for them may be useful.

post #1473008 anal weightlifting, the most common
post #1414681 penile weightlifting, unsurprisingly only 1 post
(No thumbnail) vaginal weightlifting, but I know it exists.

Sounds fine to me. Though I don't know if there will be all that many posts, outside of the anal_weightlifting in pool #7317.