Genjar said:
Tagging specific sentences is pretty unusual. Do we even have any other tags like that, besides memes?

See "related" section of text.

BlueDingo said:
See "related" section of text.

Those are all generic categories, not exact sentences.

improvised_weights - When a character is using something besides weights and weight machines for weightlifting. Originally suggested here.

post #406161post #668635post #1041148

Edit: Fuck, there are a lot of weightlifting images missing the weights tags and vice-versa. I'm fixing some of them now.

Suggesting the creation of the tag "ray_(fish)" which would be an umbrella tag for species members of the batoidea superorder (a.k.a. rays).

Logical implications:

• ray_(fish) → fish.
• manta_ray → ray_(fish).
• stingray → ray_(fish).

Genjar said:
Those are all generic categories, not exact sentences.

That's why I was suggesting something along the lines of implied_command or some such thing. Also more clearly encompasses similar ones like these

post #768881 post #168973

They don't fit with command exactly, but it's clearly what's going on.

notnobody said:
That's why I was suggesting something along the lines of implied_command or some such thing. Also more clearly encompasses similar ones like these

post #768881 post #168973

They don't fit with command exactly, but it's clearly what's going on.

Yeah, and 'command' is kind of ambiguous.
Maybe there should be a domination subtag for verbal domination..

I started tagging american_badger. Can be hard to tell the difference from the European badger so if you like a tagging challenge this is for you.

obamicon - Parody images made in a similar style to the Barack Obama 'Hope' poster. Thanks hslugs for letting me know what it is.

eyelid_pull_taunt - When a character pulls their eyelid down and sticks their tongue out. More info.

post #1006456post #939238

helicopter_tail - When a character spins their tail(s) around like helicopter blades.

protruding_heart - When a character's heart protrudes from their chest.

post #322485post #849381

Good tags

I'm surprised to see that anal_virgin isn't a tag. I'll start tagging it unless anyone have any objections.

Sorrowless said:
I'm surprised to see that anal_virgin isn't a tag. I'll start tagging it unless anyone have any objections.

I) What criteria do you intend to use, dialog?

II) We already have a "virgin" tag, why Does a tag specifically for characters who never had anal sex would be necessary?

And more importantly, how often is it obvious that a character hasn't taken it up the ass before?

"Obvious" as it can be determined strictly from looking at the image, not from information found elsewhere.

I can't think of any pointers other than dialogue.
For the same reason anyone want to see someone's regular virginity taken.

I think the situation is common enough to warrant its own tag.

Sorrowless said:
I can't think of any pointers other than dialogue.
For the same reason anyone want to see someone's regular virginity taken.

I think the situation is common enough to warrant its own tag.

Losing your virginity involves breaking the hymen and results in bleeding. The virgin tag is mostly used on images where one of those things are present.

Losing your anal virginity has no symptoms at all. Without dialogue, there is no way to know if it's happened or not.

BlueDingo said:
Losing your virginity involves breaking the hymen and results in bleeding. The virgin tag is mostly used on images where one of those things are present.

I) only valid for characters with a vagina.

II) is perfectly possible for the first sexual act don't result in hymen rupture due the membrane's elasticity.

III) hymen may be ruptured through the vaginal insertion of an object, not nescesarily involving sex.

IV) invalid for most animal species (disregarding artistic licence).

Yeah, a lot of what is commonly believed about hymen and virginity is nonsense.
You can't tell if someone's a virgin from the hymen, and bleeding is usually nothing but a sign of inexperience: too rough sex, or too dry (because of first-time nervousness and lack of foreplay).

But since a lot of artists still stick to the cherry-popping myth, that's what we tag as virgin. Even if it has nothing to do with real life. Whereas anal virginity is something that you can't tag by TWYS.

Genjar said:
[…] But since a lot of artists still stick to the cherry-popping myth, that's what we tag as virgin.

Wait, does that means we don't use "virgin" for male and dickgirl charactes?

Genjar said:
[…] Whereas anal virginity is something that you can't tag by TWYS.

Dialog and context (e.g. the presence of a creature which is only visible for virgins).

O16 said:
Dialog and context (e.g. the presence of a creature which is only visible for virgins).

This is the illiteracy argument again: Whether we should tag something based on dialogue?

If we not supposed to do it for gender, why should we do it for this?

BlueDingo said:

If we not supposed to do it for gender, why should we do it for this?

Gender (usually) is directly related to visible physical characteristics; virginity, not exactly.

O16 said:
I) only valid for characters with a vagina.

Why? Last time I checked guys can be virgins, too.

Sorrowless said:
Why? Last time I checked guys can be virgins, too.

I was referring to the concept of virginity based on hymen's integrity, precisely to expose how restrictive and inaccurate it is.

I can't believe this is now going to be a tag...

urinating_from_chin
(Thought I don't expect a lot of posts with this tag... awaiting replacement)

Faux-Pa said:
I can't believe this is now going to be a tag...

urinating_from_chin
(Thought I don't expect a lot of posts with this tag... awaiting replacement)

Great! A new tag to add to our wonderful collection of "things that almost never will be used again".

O16 said:
Great! A new tag to add to our wonderful collection of "things that almost never will be used again".

Hence awaiting replacement.

Faux-Pa said:
Hence awaiting replacement.

Unusual_urethral_placement ?

Sorrowless said:
Unusual_urethral_placement ?

This sort of thing is so rare, that even not specifying the placement of the urethra the tag wouldn't turn to be truely useful. Maybe "unusual_orifice_placement" (or something alike) would be better; this way, it might just be accompanied by the name of the orifice in question (e.g. unusual_orifice_placement + urethra).

Faux-Pa said:
Hence awaiting replacement.

I know, that was an ironic joke (that is why it is in italics).

I made the vaginal_footjob tag. I don't think I need an approval process for this one.

Sorrowless said:
I made the vaginal_footjob tag. I don't think I need an approval process for this one.

After some searching I found toe_fingering (3 posts), but I think your tag is clearer.

Circeus said:
After some searching I found toe_fingering (3 posts), but I think your tag is clearer.

Thanks for adding the tag on a few posts.

Sorrowless said:
I made the vaginal_footjob tag. I don't think I need an approval process for this one.

I don't know if it's required or not, but if you make a new tag it helps if you add at least a basic description for the wiki entry, even if it seems obvious to you what the tag is illustrating.

Borrowing from footjob, I made one for VF.

imagoober said:
I don't know if it's required or not, but if you make a new tag it helps if you add at least a basic description for the wiki entry, even if it seems obvious to you what the tag is illustrating.

Borrowing from footjob, I made one for VF.

I'll keep that in mind.

I changed double_cunnilingus to collaborative_cunnilingus.

disposable_cup - Cups designed to be used once then chucked out.

post #854469

multicolored_sclera - When a character's sclera is more than one color. Not sure if this should go under multicolored_eyes instead.

post #622626

reverse_cervical_penetration

clothing_around_neck - When an article of clothing is tied around a character's neck. Similar to clothing_around_waist.

post #1160279

wide_crotch

Characters that have a wide crotch, fairly common among species with thick tails.

post #296046 post #941646 post #1042456 post #944897 post #1157330

in regards to wide_hips these can obviously fit under that too but from what i can tell that tag is very well saturated with stereotypical voluminous body forms and so called motherly hips with near absent crotch and not much in the way of filtering that out.

opinions?

Ruku said:
wide_crotch

Characters that have a wide crotch, fairly common among species with thick tails.

in regards to wide_hips these can obviously fit under that too but from what i can tell that tag is very well saturated with stereotypical voluminous body forms and so called motherly hips with near absent crotch and not much in the way of filtering that out.

opinions?

Wouldn't this overlap with thigh_gap?

BlueDingo said:
Wouldn't this overlap with thigh_gap?

not really, overall usage seems to imply a visible "hole" under the groin has to be visible when the legs are wedged together and only then can it be tagged, not any figure that has their legs anatomically set far apart... it is also mostly gender specific.

dreadlock_beard - When a character has dreadlocks in their beard.

post #1080349

I'll make an implication request later if I can get the tag numbers up high enough.

bubbles_(clu_clu_land) and clu_clu_land - Apparently, we've had an image of this little guy for over 4 years and no one noticed.

post #249428

Just created the wiki entry for half_blind. Pretty self-explanatory.

JAKXXX3 said:
Just created the wiki entry for half_blind. Pretty self-explanatory.

We already had a tag for that.

BlueDingo said:
We already had a tag for that.

Oh darn, I'll retag the half_blind posts then.

While we've got multicolored_tongue already, that can include all variety of multiple colors, including just having it stained from a lollipop. Made a dipstick_tongue tag for when it's got the design where it goes into the next color after a certain length (such as just at the tip, or half of the tongue, etc).

sideways_baseball_cap - When a character wears a baseball cap sideways.

post #786620

BlueDingo said:
sideways_baseball_cap - When a character wears a baseball cap sideways.

Wouldn't sideways_cap serve the same purpose while being shorter?

I just found an image containing what Google seems to call corset_arm_warmers. Not sure if that's the correct name, but it's a tag now.

post #109891

BlueDingo said:
I just found an image containing what Google seems to call corset_arm_warmers. Not sure if that's the correct name, but it's a tag now.

post #109891

These look more like flexible vambraces to me (although I don't know what to say about the ribbons).

per forum #230280 we have decided on the addition of a nude_modelling tag.

<3_with_hands, for when a character (or pair of characters) are making a heart with their hands.
post #1139532
Edited to swap out a deleted image

Furrin_Gok said:
<3_with_hands, for when a character (or pair of characters) are making a heart with their hands.

hand_heart

BlueDingo said:
hand_heart

I thought we were supposed to use <3 for hearts. Guess that's a tag to suggest an alias for then.

Furrin_Gok said:
I thought we were supposed to use <3 for hearts. Guess that's a tag to suggest an alias for then.

Sounds consistent to me.

Just like we have a tag for furred dragons, I propose we should have a tag for furred insects, which implies insect and fur. Mainly due to the fact that not all insects are furred and this could separate them into an easy to search category.

Goo_transformation.
For stuff like this:
post #1002382 post #704735 post #575457 post #144675

Might need a better name, but we can always rename it later. Needed to tag those as something while cleaning the old goo tag.

What do you guys think of a tag like pseudo-oviposition for specifically when an egg-like object (but not a real egg) is inserted into or expelled from an orifice.
Pictures related post #1242566 post #826059 post #595319

Doc_Dragoon said:
What do you guys think of a tag like pseudo-oviposition for specifically when an egg-like object (but not a real egg) is inserted into or expelled from an orifice.
Pictures related post #1242566 post #826059 post #595319

That could be rather tricky as eggs are highly variable in shape, size and coloration and such its not always easy to tell the diference and may result in conflict of opinion as to what users are seeing. obviously you can tell a pokeball in the 1st example but other objects are less clear, some eggs from amphibians can easily be mistaken for marbles and i wouldnt be surprized if there is some fictional or real species that actually lays eggs with tennisball like markings>>

recycling_symbol - ♲ - Because this character has one on his ear tag.

post #562698

Should we create a group for tags that cover symbols like this?

BlueDingo said:

Should we create a group for tags that cover symbols like this?

We do have 'symbol', although it is somewhat broad.

O16 said:
We do have 'symbol', although it is somewhat broad.

I guess that's a good enough place to list it.

I'm not sure why nuclear and biohazard_symbol are listed under "political", though, since those are warning symbols and have nothing to do with politics.

BlueDingo said:
I guess that's a good enough place to list it.

I'm not sure why nuclear and biohazard_symbol are listed under "political", though, since those are warning symbols and have nothing to do with politics.

The + sign is also under it. Maybe someone had an incredibly charged discussion with a lifeguard at one point?

Strikerman said:
The + sign is also under it. Maybe someone had an incredibly charged discussion with a lifeguard at one point?

Probably because of the White Cross, which is the Swedish flag.

Furrin_Gok said:
Probably because of the White Cross, which is the Swedish flag.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Flag_of_Sweden.svg
what

Furrin_Gok said:
Probably because of the White Cross, which is the Swedish flag.

Don't you mean Denmark?

raw_tumblr_same_dimensions

Lance_Armstrong said:
raw_tumblr_same_dimensions

And that means...

O16 said:
And that means...

I'm guessing it's for Tumblr images where the "1280" version and the "raw" version have the same dimensions.

BlueDingo said:
Don't you mean Denmark?

No, I mean Switzerland

I always see Swiss and think Sweedish, not Switz. Not sure why I haven't learned yet.

Just created the v-cut tag for that distinctive muscle shape below the abs.
post #1042775 post #1255096 post #1261661

I'm gonna make seashell_panties a tag, being the bottom equivalent to a seashell_bra.

But I'm not sure if these posts should also be tagged seashell_panties or if they should be tagged something else.

Or should some other tag be used for all of the above posts?