Topic: Tag Implication: Chromamancer -> detailed_background

Posted under General

Implicating Chromamancer -> detailed_background.

Reason: HAVE YOU SEEN THEIR ART?!

I've already added it to current images, but good freaking lord.... @_@

(And yes, this is a bit of a joke post, trying to get people to look at the art more. My god is it beautiful....)

Updated by TonyCoon

What is this? An individual fooling around with serious business? When i get you i'll... that is some mighty fine artwork right there! Okay, i will not slip loose the hounds of war upon you this time, but i will keep my eye on you, young man / woman.
/Sarcasm XD

Updated by anonymous

You're assuming all art by him is going to have a detailed background. Might not always be the case. Same reason we don't implicate character tags to a gender, because that character isn't always going to show up as that gender in every single image.

Updated by anonymous

....-.- *slaps tony upside the head* do more than read the title.

Updated by anonymous

I didn't take "bit of a joke post" to mean "this thread is 100% not serious".

Even then, no, the implication obviously won't be added.

Updated by anonymous