The tag implication #68817 creaking_(minecraft) -> minecraft is pending approval.
Reason: Same reason as other character/game implications
Topic: Tag implication: creaking_(minecraft) -> Minecraft
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
are there any other recently added mobs that ought to be implicated as well?
dba_afish said:
are there any other recently added mobs that ought to be implicated as well?
I'll look at the past 5 years, because that's probably good enough, and I got bored:
1.15
1.16
- hoglin ❌
- piglin ✅
- strider_(minecraft) ✅
- zoglin ❌❌
- 1.16.2
- piglin_brute (aliased to piglin)
1.17
1.19
1.20.x
- 1.20
- 1.20.5
- armadillo_(minecraft) ❌
- The eight new wolf variants:
- rusty_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- spotted_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- black_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- striped_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- snowy_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- ashen_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- woods_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- chestnut_wolf_(minecraft) ❌
- (pale_wolf_(minecraft) ❌ is the original wolf design)
- There is currently a BUR for the wolf variants: topic #43985
1.21.x
- bogged_(minecraft) (wiki) ❌
- breeze_(minecraft) ✅
- 1.21.2
- Added size variants for dolphins, squids, and salmon, but that should be irrelevant from a tagging standpoint.
- 1.21.4
- creaking_(minecraft) (wiki) ❌ - this thread.
- 1.21.5
- The temperate variants for the classic farm mobs:
- warm_pig_(minecraft) ❌
- cold_pig_(minecraft) ❌
- warm_cow_(minecraft) ❌
- cold_cow_(minecraft) ❌
- cold_chicken_(minecraft) ❌❌
- warm_chicken_(minecraft) ❌❌
- The previously existing variant is now known as "temperate"
- 1.21.6
- Upcoming 1.21.9
If it wasn't obvious, key:
✅ = implies minecraft
❌ = doesn't imply
❌❌ = doesn't imply and the tag also doesn't exist
There's a good few omissions here.
I created a single request for sniffer_(minecraft) -> minecraft (topic #58764) because it's the only one that seems to actually be trivial where the others pose questions:
- Minecraft variants of animals are already a little contentious (topic #43315, topic #43985) and piling variants on top of them right now may be dubious.
- Should happy_ghast_(minecraft) imply ghast_(minecraft), or directly to minecraft?
- And for the ghastling, being the young form of a happy ghast, be aliased or implied to happy_ghast_(minecraft)?
Updated
there's probably also some mob vote things that are worth including as well. seems like some of them already have them, glare_(minecraft) and its (untill recently) similarly ill-fated brother, copper_golem_(minecraft), both have implications already, along with tuff_golem_(minecraft) specifically, but no others from what I can see, including moobloom_(minecraft), and a few others with some tag population.