The tag alias #78760 neck_stump -> neck_stump(on_body) has been rejected.
Reason: practically the same thing
EDIT: The tag alias neck_stump -> neck_stump(on_body) (forum #461497) has been rejected by @whatismyname1234.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag alias #78760 neck_stump -> neck_stump(on_body) has been rejected.
Reason: practically the same thing
EDIT: The tag alias neck_stump -> neck_stump(on_body) (forum #461497) has been rejected by @whatismyname1234.
Updated by auto moderator
The bulk update request #11862 is pending approval.
mass update neck_stump(on_body) -> neck_stump
Reason: Alternate choice with proper target to remove unnecessary suffixing.
The suffix isn't formatted correctly (it should be neck_stump_(on_body)), and it doesn't make much sense the way it's worded.
For neck_stump(on_head), there's only ever been 1 post with it, made by user kubihazusaikou.
There's only 14 posts for neck_stump(on_body), and they were all added by the same user, kubihazusaikou.
I'd say manually removing the tags & telling kubihazusaikou to stop would be better, unless there's an agreement that this distinction is actually useful, in which case I'd argue for manually updating the tags & telling them to use the correct formatting.
I feel like neck_stump(on_head) should just be severed_head.
aacafah said:
For neck_stump(on_head), there's only ever been 1 post with it, made by user kubihazusaikou.There's only 14 posts for neck_stump(on_body), and they were all added by the same user, kubihazusaikou.
I'd say manually removing the tags & telling kubihazusaikou to stop would be better, unless there's an agreement that this distinction is actually useful, in which case I'd argue for manually updating the tags & telling them to use the correct formatting.
Yeah, I created the BUR to see if anybody has better alternatives for the tags, since I am not that well-acquainted with the stump tags.
As far as I can tell, neck_stump could be vague as well (e.g., stump on the "head" end or "body" end?).
dba_afish said:
I feel like neck_stump(on_head) should just be severed_head.
I manually moved it.
Considering how infrequently there will be a severed neck segment that's not attached to a severed head, I'd say severed_head should replace neck_stump where relevant & neck_stump should solely refer to the body's. Either that or use beheaded_corpse or beheaded_body as the inverse.
aacafah said:
Either that or use beheaded_corpse or beheaded_body as the inverse.
We already use headless and missing_head.
thegreatwolfgang said:
The bulk update request #11862 is pending approval.mass update neck_stump(on_body) -> neck_stump
I would like you to add the alias neck_stump(on_head) -> neck_stump as well to your BUR
whatismyname1234 said:
I would like you to add the alias neck_stump(on_head) -> neck_stump as well to your BUR
It was initially added and then subsequently removed after I fixed the 1 post it was tagged with.
Aliases are unnecessary for tags that are not a common problem or only used by one user.
The tag alias neck_stump -> neck_stump(on_body) (forum #461497) has been rejected by @whatismyname1234.