The tag alias #78522 male_impregnating_male -> male_impregnation is pending approval.

Reason: Seems fairly obvious to me

I would like to hear your reasons. I can see the argument for making this an implication instead so that we could have distinct tags like gynomorph_impregnating_male and the like.

Did you mean to make an implication?

leafdapple said:
I would like to hear your reasons. I can see the argument for making this an implication instead so that we could have distinct tags like gynomorph_impregnating_male and the like.

that dosn't seem like it'd be necessary when those should already be covered with the <gender>_impregnation along with either pairing tags or x/p/y tags. x_impregnating_y seems overly specific to me.

At most, I could see separate x_impregnating and y_impregnated tags or something, but I'm not a fan of adding/legitimizing more x_verbing_y tags. Especially when one, male_impregnating_female, alone would end up on probably 90+% of impregnation posts.

watsit said:
At most, I could see separate x_impregnating and y_impregnated tags or something, but I'm not a fan of adding/legitimizing more x_verbing_y tags. Especially when one, male_impregnating_female, alone would end up on probably 90+% of impregnation posts.

Yeah, I can see how x_verbing_y creates way too many tags for little gain. I'm not a fan of male_impregnation since it's not clear whether the male is impregnating someone or getting pregnant. I think *_impregnating and *_impregnated tags would be cool.