The tag implication #68303 laced_underwear -> underwear has been rejected.

Reason: Type of underwear

EDIT: The tag implication laced_underwear -> underwear (forum #456778) has been rejected by @spe.

I think this would be better as lace_*, and it also should have some aliases (laced -> lace or vice versa) as well as an implication from lace panties so that tag isn't off floating in the aether

donovan_dmc said:
I think this would be better as lace_*, and it also should have some aliases (laced -> lace or vice versa) as well as an implication from lace panties so that tag isn't off floating in the aether

laced ≠ lace

post #1373336

pleaseletmein said:
laced ≠ lace

post #1373336

It would probably be useful for literally any of these tags to have a wiki page

A lot of the results for laced_underwear should have been tagged lace_underwear though, so maybe it needs to be disambiguated instead.

spe said:
A lot of the results for laced_underwear should have been tagged lace_underwear though, so maybe it needs to be disambiguated instead.

I'm not sure what other term would apply.

regsmutt said:
I'm not sure what other term would apply.

lace_up_fly_* or just lace_up_*

dba_afish said:
lace_up_fly_* or just lace_up_*

entwined_underwear

nin10dope said:
entwined_underwear

Yeah I always make sure to properly entwine my shoes. I find tight-entwined corsets aesthetically interesting.

That's a terrible synonym.

regsmutt said:
Yeah I always make sure to properly entwine my shoes. I find tight-entwined corsets aesthetically interesting.

That's a terrible synonym.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ How about offering your own then, wise guy

dba_afish said:
lace_up_fly_* or just lace_up_*

+1 to lace_up_*, sounds distinct enough from lacey/lace/laced underwear and makes sense

manitka said:
+1 to lace_up_*, sounds distinct enough from lacey/lace/laced underwear and makes sense

lace up sounds like it would both solve the tag name being ambiguous and it being easy to mistag via missing a single d (lace underwear vs laced underwear), which is very easy to do

Because of how close they are it would probably be good to do an update and then disambiguation

Behold, underwear which is both lace and laced:
post #5666033

But yeah, lace_up sounds decent. I’m gonna reject the current request, who wants to make a BUR to switch the current tag names over?

The tag implication laced_underwear -> underwear (forum #456778) has been rejected by @spe.

The bulk update request #11605 is pending approval.

remove implication laced_jockstrap (30) -> laced_underwear (54)
remove implication laced_jockstrap (30) -> jockstrap (21240)
remove alias lace_jockstrap (0) -> laced_jockstrap (30)
remove alias laced_jock_strap (0) -> laced_jockstrap (30)
mass update laced_underwear -> lace_up_underwear
mass update laced_jockstrap -> lace_up_jockstrap

Reason: Followup:

imply lace_up_underwear -> underwear
imply lace_up_jockstrap -> lace_up_underwear
imply lace_up_jockstrap -> jockstrap
alias laced_underwear -> laced_underwear_(disambiguation)
category laced_underwear_(disambiguation) -> invalid
alias laced_jockstrap -> laced_jockstrap_(disambiguation)
alias laced_jock_strap -> laced_jockstrap_(disambiguation)
category laced_jockstrap_(disambiguation) -> invalid

Currently lace_jockstrap is aliased to laced_jockstrap, do we want to keep that alias going forward? I haven't included it in the followup for now

The bulk update request #11606 (forum #457079) has been rejected by @Donovan_DMC.