The bulk update request #11571 is active.

create implication hilary_(regular_show) (128) -> regular_show (3139)
create implication muscle_man_(regular_show) (36) -> regular_show (3139)
create implication evil_jax_(tadc) (29) -> the_amazing_digital_circus (3158)
create implication evil_pomni_(tadc) (10) -> the_amazing_digital_circus (3158)

Reason: A few characters not yet having an implication to their shows tags.

EDIT: The bulk update request #11571 (forum #456697) has been approved by @spe.

topic #47364

pleaseletmein said:
topic #47364

Seven months old BUR huh?.... Yeah BURs are invisible it seems, I will request these four individually.

urizread said:
Seven months old BUR huh?.... Yeah BURs are invisible it seems, I will request these four individually.

yeah that's not how you do that. why would you make the same requests a 3rd time but spread them out over a bunch of alias requests???

urizread said:
Seven months old BUR huh?.... Yeah BURs are invisible it seems

99% of BUR's fall onto Admin Spe on his own to Approve or Reject
They're definitely not invisible, it's just usually hundreds if not thousands of requests in the scaly hands of one lizard to handle, after taking the time to do his due diligence of informing himself on the validity and consequences of each call.

Takes time
That's all c:

The bulk update request #11571 (forum #456697) has been approved by @spe.

Handled now!

nin10dope said:
99% of BUR's fall onto Admin Spe on his own to Approve or Reject
They're definitely not invisible, it's just usually hundreds if not thousands of requests in the scaly hands of one lizard to handle, after taking the time to do his due diligence of informing himself on the validity and consequences of each call.

Takes time
That's all c:

Also yes, thanks for the explanation. This is correct. However, I am more focused on trying to keep up with reviewing new requests than trying to cut through the backlog (though I do go through the backlog sometimes as well), so older requests are much less likely to be seen. However, you can mention me and I’ll probably take a look! I try to check my name mentions in the forum now and then. That’s mostly why I saw this one now. (Just don’t abuse it - I do have a limited amount of free time. :p)

spe said:
Handled now!

Also yes, thanks for the explanation. This is correct. However, I am more focused on trying to keep up with reviewing new requests than trying to cut through the backlog (though I do go through the backlog sometimes as well), so older requests are much less likely to be seen. However, you can mention me and I’ll probably take a look! I try to check my name mentions in the forum now and then. That’s mostly why I saw this one now. (Just don’t abuse it - I do have a limited amount of free time. :p)

Wow, you even went and approved @pleaseletmein BULK requests! Thanks!

manitka said:
yeah that's not how you do that. why would you make the same requests a 3rd time but spread them out over a bunch of alias requests???

nin10dope said:
99% of BUR's fall onto Admin Spe on his own to Approve or Reject
They're definitely not invisible, it's just usually hundreds if not thousands of requests in the scaly hands of one lizard to handle, after taking the time to do his due diligence of informing himself on the validity and consequences of each call.

Takes time
That's all c:

@Manitka @Nin10dope Well, thank you both for the explanations. I was planning on cancelling the BUR request after the indiviual requests got approved (and two of them weren't in letmein BURs tho).
Logic told me that admins probably worked from older to newer requests, keeping an eye on controversial new ones, but seems I was wrong.

Welp, another thing learned. Thanks everyone!