The bulk update request #11288 is pending approval.

create alias inbred_child (44) -> inbred_(lore) (0)
change category inbred_(lore) (0) -> lore # missing

Reason: Like other familial relation tags, this should be lore.

Yeah pretty much none of these are obvious or twys in any way. The few that are accomplish it through text (dialog, diagrams- usually doesn't count for twys) or flashbacks. I could see an argument that the ones that use flashbacks are twys enough, but there's less than five of those.

maybe just inbred_(lore) though?

dba_afish said:
maybe just inbred_(lore) though?

Agreed, changed.

also probably imply from multigenerational_incest_(lore), since it's for acts of incest involving at least one character who is, themself, inbred.

dba_afish said:
also probably imply from multigenerational_incest_(lore), since it's for acts of incest involving at least one character who is, themself, inbred.

Not necessarily. There's characters who are just the child of a single incestuous pairing (brother/sister dad/daughter) in the tag. I think that's actually the majority.

regsmutt said:
Not necessarily. There's characters who are just the child of a single incestuous pairing (brother/sister dad/daughter) in the tag. I think that's actually the majority.

the child of a single incestuous pairing would be inbred_(lore). if said character were to have incestuous relations it would be multigenerational_incest_(lore). that's the definition of the tag.

there's no way to have multigenerational incest without one of the involved characters being the product of incest.

dba_afish said:
the child of a single incestuous pairing would be inbred_(lore). if said character were to have incestuous relations it would be multigenerational_incest_(lore). that's the definition of the tag.

there's no way to have multigenerational incest without one of the involved characters being the product of incest.

Oh, gotcha. I had a reading comprehension fail.