one thing that's always bugged about me with the blacklist is the fact that it always tells me how many posts are blacklisted and what they are & i mostly utilize my blacklist as like a warning system, i'm fine with that, the problem is how blatantly it tells you.

lets take flash for example, old encoder that was disabled by adobe in 2020. with my habit of pressing disable all filters, i consequently see flash content, even though its useless. or black_and_white posts that are below 50 upvotes - i don't wanna necessarily see it. now yes, that's what the blacklist is for - but consequently for using incognito, it's usually easier to press disable all filters and leave it alone compared to doing that & re-selecting all the filters + it makes my list a bit longer to manage anyways.

you can make a short tag in the blacklist that'll indicate to hide mentions of it, for example:

"dns:pedophilia_temptation"

one thing that i should also mention: if you disable and enable the blacklist, your previous checked don't save and get reset making it more difficult to catch in the event i find a post i object to if i dont pay close attention: its rare, but its happened.

okc said:
one thing that's always bugged about me with the blacklist is the fact that it always tells me how many posts are blacklisted and what they are & i mostly utilize my blacklist as like a warning system, i'm fine with that, the problem is how blatantly it tells you.

lets take flash for example, old encoder that was disabled by adobe in 2020. with my habit of pressing disable all filters, i consequently see flash content, even though its useless. or black_and_white posts that are below 50 upvotes - i don't wanna necessarily see it. now yes, that's what the blacklist is for - but consequently for using incognito, it's usually easier to press disable all filters and leave it alone compared to doing that & re-selecting all the filters + it makes my list a bit longer to manage anyways.

you can make a short tag in the blacklist that'll indicate to hide mentions of it, for example:

"dns:pedophilia_temptation"

this seems like an extremely specific situation that's not going to apply to almost any other user, and I think something like this would be a pretty big change to how the blacklist works.

I mean, if you want to permanently hide stuff like this maybe you'd want to bypass your blacklist, and just use CSS. so like, [data-tags~="pedophilia_temptation"]{ display: none } would hide those posts all the time regardless.

dba_afish said:
this seems like an extremely specific situation that's not going to apply to almost any other user, and I think something like this would be a pretty big change to how the blacklist works.

I mean, if you want to permanently hide stuff like this maybe you'd want to bypass your blacklist, and just use CSS. so like, [data-tags~="pedophilia_temptation"]{ display: none } would hide those posts all the time regardless.

thats...actually a smartass idea for my purposes, and for that i thank you. the use of css slipped my mind, but i just implemented it and it's exactly how it would work in my mind. hey, if the admins think its a good idea time will only answer that question.

dba_afish said:
this seems like an extremely specific situation that's not going to apply to almost any other user, and I think something like this would be a pretty big change to how the blacklist works.

I mean, if you want to permanently hide stuff like this maybe you'd want to bypass your blacklist, and just use CSS. so like, [data-tags~="pedophilia_temptation"]{ display: none } would hide those posts all the time regardless.

can i edit this snippet to instead always show favorites or upvotes even if blacklisted

xx_cocklover69420_xx said:
can i edit this snippet to instead always show favorites or upvotes even if blacklisted

you can add -fav:me to any (or every) line in the blacklist and it'll essentially do this. but not posts you've upvoted, that information isn't sent to your browser when on the search page.

(it won't keep the red info bar like normal blacklisted posts, though)

dba_afish said:
you can add -fav:me to any (or every) line in the blacklist and it'll essentially do this. but not posts you've upvoted, that information isn't sent to your browser when on the search page.

(it won't keep the red info bar like normal blacklisted posts, though)

Partially related, I have -user:me added to my rating:s and rating:q blacklist items, but ever since someone else added a source to one of my posts, that specific post no longer shows up as one of my uploads

nin10dope said:
Partially related, I have -user:me added to my rating:s and rating:q blacklist items, but ever since someone else added a source to one of my posts, that specific post no longer shows up as one of my uploads

The post was replaced entirely with a superior version, so it's under the replacer's account instead. The system is working exactly as designed.

lafcadio said:
The post was replaced entirely with a superior version, so it's under the replacer's account instead. The system is working exactly as designed.

Edit: Yeah I forgot I can check Replaced on my profile
I was confused because I usually go to the Tag History to find out who uploaded stuff and that still shows me

nin10dope said:
The bust one with the green Deerling?
I was confused because I usually go to the Tag History to find out who uploaded stuff and that still shows me

the tag history shows the original uploader but it dosn't show the person who's currently credited with the upload (which may be a replacer).

if you want the page to display the current credited uploader you can use this:

#image-container::after {
  white-space: pre;
  content: "\aUploaded by: " attr(data-uploader);
}

(from faucet (from SNPtheCat's user about))

dba_afish said:
the tag history shows the original uploader but it dosn't show the person who's currently credited with the upload (which may be a replacer).

if you want the page to display the current credited uploader you can use this:

#image-container::after {
  white-space: pre;
  content: "\aUploaded by: " attr(data-uploader);
}

(from faucet (from SNPtheCat's user about))

The only slight issue I have is that since I'm not the credited uploader, the -user:me addition on my blacklist doesn't protect it like my other rating:s uploads :P

nin10dope said:
The only slight issue I have is that since I'm not the credited uploader, the -user:me addition on my blacklist doesn't protect it like my other rating:s uploads :P

You can add the specific post id to your whitelist!
Just add -id:5577742 to the blacklist along with your -user:me

manitka said:
You can add the specific post id to your whitelist!
Just add -id:5577742 to the blacklist along with your -user:me

Yooo that's epic
Thank you!

dba_afish said:
[data-tags~="pedophilia_temptation"]{ display: none }

Did this break? I'm trying to see if I can use something like it and nothing I'm trying with it is working, nor am I finding any elements with data-tags attributes.
Unless re621 breaks it, though I thought its blacklist was merged into base e621.

scth said:
Did this break? I'm trying to see if I can use something like it and nothing I'm trying with it is working, nor am I finding any elements with data-tags attributes.
Unless re621 breaks it, though I thought its blacklist was merged into base e621.

it should still work. I don't know why re6 would strip the data tags from posts, although it's possible, I guess?

on the posts index, and the main part of the post page the stuff is all just in the baked in to the normal html. for user avatars on the forums and comments and blips and stuff the data is loaded in-post through JS (which is why they start by having the big IMAGE PLACEHOLDER box before the stuff's loaded). but the data should still be there when you inspect element in both cases.

note that [data-tags~="*"] is only able to handle one tag at a time if you want to do more you're going to have to add another [data-tags~="*"] selector and seperate them with a ,.

dba_afish said:
it should still work. I don't know why re6 would strip the data tags from posts, although it's possible, I guess?

on the posts index, and the main part of the post page the stuff is all just in the baked in to the normal html. for user avatars on the forums and comments and blips and stuff the data is loaded in-post through JS (which is why they start by having the big IMAGE PLACEHOLDER box before the stuff's loaded). but the data should still be there when you inspect element in both cases.

note that [data-tags~="*"] is only able to handle one tag at a time if you want to do more you're going to have to add another [data-tags~="*"] selector and seperate them with a ,.

Yep tried it in a browser without re621, re621 strips it for some reason. That's weird. Maybe instead of stripping it it just redoes all the HTML and didn't add it?

scth said:
Yep tried it in a browser without re621, re621 strips it for some reason. That's weird. Maybe instead of stripping it it just redoes all the HTML and didn't add it?

I wonder how it displays the [ANIM] tags on the top left of posts since those use [data-tags~=animated] as part of their selector to show a ::before pseudo element.

(assuming it does still do that, I don't remember it not doing that.last time I used re6.)

dba_afish said:
I wonder how it displays the [ANIM] tags on the top left of posts since those use [data-tags~=animated] as part of their selector to show a ::before pseudo element.

(assuming it does still do that, I don't remember it not doing that.last time I used re6.)

Re6 completely recreates the search page and applies its own styling to recreate what it should look like
https://github.com/re621/re621.Legacy/blob/68f810e47abb7e16eaf8c806d2ce46f4ed86eaf2/src/scss/modules/_better-search.scss#L393-L418