Topic: Clothes and the Intersex Family

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #11035 is pending approval.

create implication clothed_andromorph (196) -> andromorph (25679)
create implication clothed_andromorph (196) -> clothed_intersex (4395)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4353) -> gynomorph (207337)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4353) -> clothed_intersex (4395)
create implication clothed_herm (161) -> herm (29017)
create implication clothed_herm (161) -> clothed_intersex (4395)
create implication clothed_maleherm (35) -> maleherm (4786)
create implication clothed_maleherm (35) -> clothed_intersex (4395)
create implication clothed_intersex (4395) -> intersex (264354)
create implication clothed_intersex (4395) -> clothed (1229313)

Reason: Both clothed_male and clothed_female have these implications, and the normal versions of the intersex sub-tags all implicate intersex.

nin10dope said:
Are you sure about that?

yes. if this bur goes through clothed andro/gyno/herm/maleherm will imply clothed intersex, which will in turn imply clothed

manitka said:
yes. if this bur goes through clothed andro/gyno/herm/maleherm will imply clothed intersex, which will in turn imply clothed

Ohhhhhhh okay I get what he meant now
I thought he was saying that that implication already existed
Thanks for clarifying

nin10dope said:
Ohhhhhhh okay I get what he meant now
I thought he was saying that that implication already existed
Thanks for clarifying

no problem! bur talk can be confusing sometimes. Lord don't i know x'D

im always writing up BURS late at night and half my brain has gone, takes me like 3 read throughs lol