Last year a post of Papi (harpy from monster musume) was deleted beacuse "is a young human-like character in explicit situation". But it has just an edit of her naked, like most of the other post of her. Then all the post of her nude or having sex shoud be deleted too?

This is done case by case basis depending on what the specific individual image looks like, not by blanket nuking entire character tags. You can draw canonically child-like characters and canonically underaged characters looking like full grown adults. If you think an image should be deleted, you can always flag it to get staff review the image.

ruppari said:
This is done case by case basis depending on what the specific individual image looks like, not by blanket nuking entire character tags. You can draw canonically child-like characters and canonically underaged characters looking like full grown adults. If you think an image should be deleted, you can always flag it to get staff review the image.

in this specific case, where the charactes always looks like an underage girl with wings, what do you think?

kiki1014 said:
in this specific case, where the charactes always looks like an underage girl with wings, what do you think?

A character is never assumed to always look like something, when an artist can draw them however they want including crossgender, alternate_species, etc. We don't assume a character is something, it's always checked on a per-post basis.

kiki1014 said:
in this specific case, where the charactes always looks like an underage girl with wings, what do you think?

I looked up the character. First off I could not see any edits, so I have no clue what you meant that most posts are edits of her naked. Secondly, on every single post she looked like either straight up unquestionable full grown woman, or the image was one of those borderline cases where she may be in mid teens, but could just as well be 18+ years old. Also characters never look always young, because there is nothing that can stop an artists drawing her looking like a 70 year old.

Like I said, if you genuinely believe that an image falls under content that is not allowed, and should be deleted, flag it.

ruppari said:
I looked up the character. First off I could not see any edits, so I have no clue what you meant that most posts are edits of her naked. Secondly, on every single post she looked like either straight up unquestionable full grown woman, or the image was one of those borderline cases where she may be in mid teens, but could just as well be 18+ years old. Also characters never look always young, because there is nothing that can stop an artists drawing her looking like a 70 year old.

Like I said, if you genuinely believe that an image falls under content that is not allowed, and should be deleted, flag it.

Wouldn't you be unable to find those edits because they got deleted like OP said?

nin10dope said:
Wouldn't you be unable to find those edits because they got deleted like OP said?

To me it sounded like they were talking about current posts being edits, but I may have misunderstood. Regardless, you can include deleted posts to search results with status:any, which I did. There seem to be only 6 deleted edits involving the character.

ruppari said:
To me it sounded like they were talking about current posts being edits, but I may have misunderstood. Regardless, you can include deleted posts to search results with status:any, which I did. There seem to be only 6 deleted edits involving the character.

And... the first 3 have SK sources and are screenshots. 2 next ones are loli. Last one is also a screenshot.