The bulk update request #10919 is pending approval.

create implication hand_in_pants (997) -> pants (197989)
create implication hand_in_briefs (10) -> hand_in_underwear (1579)
create implication hand_in_briefs (10) -> briefs (19108)

Reason: The other hand_in_* tags implicate their respective clothing, but not these ones.

Bumping because this appears to have fallen through the cracks.

The problem is do we want/need to have more hand_in_* tags when hand_in_underwear briefs or similar could be sufficient?

One argument for more of them is that hand_in_panties already implies hand_in_underwear.
On the other hand, since there are so many subtypes of underwear, do we need to make hand_in_* tags for each of them?

The bulk update request #11182 is pending approval.

create alias hand_in_briefs (10) -> hand_in_underwear (1579)

Reason: An alternative.

For the record, I agree with TheGreatWolfgang on this; I think separate tags for each type of underwear is excessive.