April 7th:It's that time again e621! The 2025 staff drive will be opening later this week! Please get your resumes and forklift licenses ready and keep an eye on the news/forums. Hope to see some fresh meat for the salt mines.
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #10913 is pending approval.
mass update edwin_inculous_(character) -> edwin_inculous
change category edwin_inculous (0) -> character
Reason: Created the tag a long time ago, unsure of how to categorize tags. Would like to update the tag to properly show the the owner of the character.
3dd213 said:
mass update edwin_inculous_(character) -> edwin_inculous_(mr.ink)Reason: Created the tag a long time ago, unsure of how to categorize tags. Would like to update the tag to properly show the the owner of the character.
For unique character names, you don't need to include any suffix (either *_(character) or *_(character_owner)).
They are only reserved for when you need to differentiate between tags with the same name (e.g., edwin_inculous_(artist) vs. edwin_inculous_(character); edwin_(owner_a) vs. edwin_(owner_b)).
Therefore, using edwin_inculous as the new tag should be sufficient.
thegreatwolfgang said:
For unique character names, you don't need to include any suffix (either *_(character) or *_(character_owner)).
They are only reserved for when you need to differentiate between tags with the same name (e.g., edwin_inculous_(artist) vs. edwin_inculous_(character); edwin_(owner_a) vs. edwin_(owner_b)).
Therefore, using edwin_inculous as the new tag should be sufficient.
Ah okay, so I should just change it to this then?
Should I make a new post or?
mass update edwin_inculous_(character) -> edwin_inculous
3dd213 said:
Ah okay, so I should just change it to this then?
Should I make a new post or?mass update edwin_inculous_(character) -> edwin_inculous
You don't need to make a new post, you can edit the BUR #10913 directly to make changes.
If you want to specify the new tag as being a character tag as well, you can include:
category edwin_inculous -> character
thegreatwolfgang said:
You don't need to make a new post, you can edit the BUR #10913 directly to make changes.If you want to specify the new tag as being a character tag as well, you can include:
category edwin_inculous -> character
Alright gotcha, made the changes you suggested
You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.
Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.
