The tag implication #67179 soiled_diaper -> feces is pending approval.

Reason: soiled_diaper implies feces, plus soiling_diaper already implicates feces

Using this thread to bump topic #39182

Also no, soiling diaper does not imply feces, it implies pooping which does not imply feces (you can show someone pooping on the toilet without showing feces) The question is whether there is a scenario where you can see a soiled diaper without being able to tag feces).

snpthecat said:
Using this thread to bump topic #39182

Also no, soiling diaper does not imply feces, it implies pooping which does not imply feces (you can show someone pooping on the toilet without showing feces) The question is whether there is a scenario where you can see a soiled diaper without being able to tag feces).

It implies soiling which implies feces

This implication has precedent as both wetting_diaper (wetting_diaper -> wetting -> urine) and wet_diaper (wet_diaper -> urine) imply urine

donovan_dmc said:
It implies soiling which implies feces

This implication has precedent as both wetting_diaper (wetting_diaper -> wetting -> urine) and wet_diaper (wet_diaper -> urine) imply urine

Ah fair enough

So the question now is whether soiled diaper should imply soiling, or more specifically whether soiling applies to both present and past instances of soiling as the wiki states