The bulk update request #10829 is pending approval.
create implication female_dominating_female (335) -> dominant_female (47047)
create implication female_dominating_female (335) -> submissive_female (43646)
create implication female_dominating_male (1738) -> dominant_female (47047) # duplicate of implication #67105
create implication female_dominating_male (1738) -> submissive_male (83805)
create implication female_dominating_gynomorph (90) -> dominant_female (47047)
create implication female_dominating_gynomorph (90) -> submissive_gynomorph (1670)
create implication female_dominating_andromorph (0) -> dominant_female (47047)
create implication female_dominating_andromorph (0) -> submissive_andromorph (872)
Reason: Logically, an x_dominating_y tag always implies that x is dominant and y is submissive. While its usage normally allows for searching for fairly specific dynamics, there are a lot of posts that either only have dominant_x, submissive_y, or - significantly more rarely - x_dominating_y, which makes it very likely that when searching for a specific dom/sub dynamic, a lot of posts slip through the cracks.
Having the x_dominating_y imply dominant_x and submissive_y would make tagging these dynamics just that much less cumbersome, and easier to find too without using a dozen tags at a time to make sure nothing slips through.