Topic: x_dominating_x implications BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10829 is pending approval.

create implication female_dominating_female (335) -> dominant_female (46949)
create implication female_dominating_female (335) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication female_dominating_male (1706) -> dominant_female (46949) # duplicate of implication #67105
create implication female_dominating_male (1706) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication female_dominating_gynomorph (90) -> dominant_female (46949)
create implication female_dominating_gynomorph (90) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication female_dominating_andromorph (0) -> dominant_female (46949)
create implication female_dominating_andromorph (0) -> submissive_andromorph (872)

Reason: Logically, an x_dominating_y tag always implies that x is dominant and y is submissive. While its usage normally allows for searching for fairly specific dynamics, there are a lot of posts that either only have dominant_x, submissive_y, or - significantly more rarely - x_dominating_y, which makes it very likely that when searching for a specific dom/sub dynamic, a lot of posts slip through the cracks.
Having the x_dominating_y imply dominant_x and submissive_y would make tagging these dynamics just that much less cumbersome, and easier to find too without using a dozen tags at a time to make sure nothing slips through.

The bulk update request #10830 is pending approval.

create implication male_dominating_female (1951) -> dominant_male (58488)
create implication male_dominating_female (1951) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication male_dominating_male (625) -> dominant_male (58488)
create implication male_dominating_male (625) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication male_dominating_gynomorph (72) -> dominant_male (58488)
create implication male_dominating_gynomorph (72) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication male_dominating_andromorph (38) -> dominant_male (58488)
create implication male_dominating_andromorph (38) -> submissive_andromorph (872)

Reason: Part 2

The bulk update request #10831 is pending approval.

create implication gynomorph_dominating_female (187) -> dominant_gynomorph (5726)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_female (187) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_male (171) -> dominant_gynomorph (5726)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_male (171) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_gynomorph (56) -> dominant_gynomorph (5726)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_gynomorph (56) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_andromorph (2) -> dominant_gynomorph (5726)
create implication gynomorph_dominating_andromorph (2) -> submissive_andromorph (872)

Reason: part 3

The bulk update request #10832 has been rejected.

create implication andromorph_dominating_female (0) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_female (0) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication andromorph_dominating_male (1) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_male (1) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication andromorph_dominating_gynomorph (1) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_gynomorph (1) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication andromorph_dominating_andromorph (1) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_andromorph (1) -> submissive_andromorph (872)
create implication andromorph_dominating_herm (0) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_herm (0) -> submissive_herm (272)
create implication andromorph_dominating_maleherm (0) -> dominant_andromorph (298)
create implication andromorph_dominating_maleherm (0) -> submissive_maleherm (40)

Reason: part 4

EDIT: The bulk update request #10832 (forum #444829) has been rejected by @haroga.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #10833 has been rejected.

create implication herm_dominating_female (15) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_female (15) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication herm_dominating_male (4) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_male (4) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication herm_dominating_gynomorph (1) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_gynomorph (1) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication herm_dominating_andromorph (0) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_andromorph (0) -> submissive_andromorph (872)
create implication herm_dominating_herm (6) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_herm (6) -> submissive_herm (272)
create implication herm_dominating_maleherm (0) -> dominant_herm (442)
create implication herm_dominating_maleherm (0) -> submissive_maleherm (40)

Reason: part 5

EDIT: The bulk update request #10833 (forum #444830) has been rejected by @haroga.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #10834 has been rejected.

create implication maleherm_dominating_female (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_female (0) -> submissive_female (43588)
create implication maleherm_dominating_male (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_male (0) -> submissive_male (83630)
create implication maleherm_dominating_gynomorph (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_gynomorph (0) -> submissive_gynomorph (1664)
create implication maleherm_dominating_andromorph (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_andromorph (0) -> submissive_andromorph (872)
create implication maleherm_dominating_herm (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_herm (0) -> submissive_herm (272)
create implication maleherm_dominating_maleherm (0) -> dominant_maleherm (16)
create implication maleherm_dominating_maleherm (0) -> submissive_maleherm (40)

Reason: part 6

EDIT: The bulk update request #10834 (forum #444831) has been rejected by @haroga.

Updated by auto moderator