The bulk update request #10803 is pending approval.

create implication unawareacles (186) -> tentacle_sex (22345)
create implication unawareacles (186) -> oblivious_sex (130)
create implication senses_blocked_trap (119) -> oblivious (4553)

Reason: These implications all seem obvious to me. The description for senses_blocked_trap says it can be used in non-tentacle contexts, so I'm not implicating any tentacle- or sex-related tags for it.

did we never agree on what this tag's name ought to be? there's what what, like, 4+ different names for essentially the same thing, unawareacles, tentacle_trap, tentacle_pit, senses_blocked_trap?

Related: topic #40852

dba_afish said:
did we never agree on what this tag's name ought to be? there's what what, like, 4+ different names for essentially the same thing, unawareacles, tentacle_trap, tentacle_pit, senses_blocked_trap?

tentacle_trap and tentacle_pit don't necessarily have the "unaware" part. They could probably be merged, though. senses_blocked_trap says that it doesn't need to include tentacles, but in practice senses_blocked_trap -tentacles produces no significant results (the first two posts are part of a sequence that reveals it is a tentacle trap), so they could probably be merged as well.