The bulk update request #10794 is pending approval.
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (213) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (59)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (9) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (59)
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (213) -> looking_at_penis (19681)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (9) -> looking_at_balls (178)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (59) -> looking_at_genitalia (22172)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (59) -> looking_at_partner (38512)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (14) -> looking_at_butt (2940)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (14) -> looking_at_partner (38512)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (9) -> looking_at_crotch (186)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (9) -> looking_at_partner (38512)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (3) -> looking_at_belly (1269)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (3) -> looking_at_partner (38512)
Reason: I noticed these tags had been created but didn't have any implications pointing them back to looking_at_[thing being looked at] and looking_at_partner.
As for whether these implications should be created rather than the tags deleted, I think it should be pretty easy to keep them clean, and more specific tagging systems are never a bad thing.