The bulk update request #10794 is pending approval.
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (182) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (52)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (6) -> looking_at_partner's_genitalia (52)
create implication looking_at_partner's_penis (182) -> looking_at_penis (19038)
create implication looking_at_partner's_balls (6) -> looking_at_balls (170)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (52) -> looking_at_genitalia (21400)
create implication looking_at_partner's_genitalia (52) -> looking_at_partner (37312)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (13) -> looking_at_butt (2793)
create implication looking_at_partner's_butt (13) -> looking_at_partner (37312)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (7) -> looking_at_crotch (185)
create implication looking_at_partner's_crotch (7) -> looking_at_partner (37312)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (3) -> looking_at_belly (1226)
create implication looking_at_partner's_belly (3) -> looking_at_partner (37312)
Reason: I noticed these tags had been created but didn't have any implications pointing them back to looking_at_[thing being looked at] and looking_at_partner.
As for whether these implications should be created rather than the tags deleted, I think it should be pretty easy to keep them clean, and more specific tagging systems are never a bad thing.