Topic: Penis in urethra

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

romanicyte2 said:
The bulk update request #10790 is pending approval.

create implication penis_in_penis (2032) -> penis_in_urethra (135)

Reason: The point is to imply penis_in_penis -> penis_in_urethra, since penis in urethra already implies urethral penetration.

Penis in penis requires "the urethral_penetration of a penis by another penis", therefore it implies penis in urethra, which can't be requested directly.

You can add

imply penis_in_penis -> penis_in_urethra 
unimply penis_in_penis -> penile_penetration

to your already existing BUR.
As to whether penis_in_urethra should imply penis is up to you

untamed said:
What if it's a penis going into the urethra of a vagina?

Never seen it, but what does this have to do with penis_in_penis -> penis_in_urethra?

snpthecat said:

Fixed.

romanicyte2 said:
It's just a single request now that didn't need to be a BUR, woops, but now I think the request really is valid.

hey at least BURs are always nice cause you can add or subtract from them without making a new one! :D