The tag implication #67071 ambient_ray -> ambient_fish has been rejected.

Reason: Rays are fish and all that, the usual. I think they're distinct enough to where this tag isn't useless?

And if they're not distinct enough, these two should be aliased instead of having the ray tag be in this weird limbo.

EDIT: The tag implication ambient_ray -> ambient_fish (forum #443870) has been rejected by @Bugabond.

Unless you're referring to an ambient ray of light. The tag seems a touch ambiguous.

You're not wrong. It didn't occur to me this one could use a disambiguation. Give me a moment.

The tag implication ambient_ray -> ambient_fish (forum #443870) has been rejected by @Bugabond.

The bulk update request #10778 is pending approval.

create alias ambient_ray (2) -> ambient_ray_(disambiguation) (0)
change category ambient_ray_(disambiguation) (0) -> invalid
create implication ambient_ray_(fish) (0) -> ambient_fish (656)

Reason: I'm only sure how the species version of this tag would be called, though. I'm not sure how the lightning version would/should be called or what it should be aliased to.