The tag implication #67069 neckwear -> clothing is pending approval.

Reason: I feel that neckwear should be considered either clothing or accessory, and clothing makes more sense.

The bulk update request #10773 is pending approval.

create implication neckwear (14217) -> accessory (158659)

Reason: An alternative.

I don't think either works. As it seems to me, some neckwear may be considered a form of clothing (scarfs, neckerchiefs?) while others are accessories (collars, neckties), so it can't be assumed one or the other.

The bulk update request #10779 is pending approval.

create implication neckerchief (11401) -> clothing (2273135)
create implication scarf (51040) -> clothing (2273135)
create implication ascot (1329) -> accessory (158659)
create implication bib (2765) -> accessory (158659)
create implication bow_tie (33023) -> accessory (158659)
create implication cravat (473) -> accessory (158659)
create implication jabot (45) -> accessory (158659)
create implication ruff_(clothing) (253) -> accessory (158659)
create implication shirt_collar (1804) -> accessory (158659)

Reason: Let's do it on a case-by-case basis, then. These implications are in line with what is stated on the neckwear page.

For the record: The main reason I wanted to make this implication is to clarify whether characters wearing only these items should be considered mostly_nude or nude, so keep that in mind when considering these. There's currently no official standard, which makes it impossible to reliably tag such images.