The tag implication #67069 neckwear -> clothing is pending approval.
Reason: I feel that neckwear should be considered either clothing or accessory, and clothing makes more sense.
News: Apr 07, 2025 Show
April 7th:It's that time again e621! The 2025 staff drive will be opening later this week! Please get your resumes and forklift licenses ready and keep an eye on the news/forums. Hope to see some fresh meat for the salt mines.
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
Topic: Tag implication: neckwear -> clothing
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The bulk update request #10773 is pending approval.
create implication neckwear (13543) -> accessory (152676)
Reason: An alternative.
I don't think either works. As it seems to me, some neckwear may be considered a form of clothing (scarfs, neckerchiefs?) while others are accessories (collars, neckties), so it can't be assumed one or the other.
The bulk update request #10779 is pending approval.
create implication neckerchief (10923) -> clothing (2203640)
create implication scarf (49607) -> clothing (2203640)
create implication ascot (1285) -> accessory (152676)
create implication bib (2633) -> accessory (152676)
create implication bow_tie (31898) -> accessory (152676)
create implication cravat (450) -> accessory (152676)
create implication jabot (42) -> accessory (152676)
create implication ruff_(clothing) (246) -> accessory (152676)
create implication shirt_collar (1695) -> accessory (152676)
Reason: Let's do it on a case-by-case basis, then. These implications are in line with what is stated on the neckwear page.
For the record: The main reason I wanted to make this implication is to clarify whether characters wearing only these items should be considered mostly_nude or nude, so keep that in mind when considering these. There's currently no official standard, which makes it impossible to reliably tag such images.