The bulk update request #10764 has been rejected.

create implication chubby_girly (787) -> femboy (166068)

Reason: part 1 of 2, first have chubby girly imply femboy, in line with girly being aliased to femboy. Adds the femboy tag to chubby_girly posts.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10764 (forum #443796) has been rejected by @jerdude002.

The bulk update request #10765 has been rejected.

mass update chubby_girly -> slightly_chubby_male
change category chubby_girly (787) -> invalid
remove implication chubby_girly (787) -> femboy (166068)

Reason: part 2 of 2, mass change chubby girly to slightly chubby male, so now all posts currently tagged chubby_girly will have femboy and slightly_chubby_male, and no longer have chubby_girly.
Make chubby_girly invalid because girly is not a gender or form, therefore it doesn't get its own dedicated tag in the form slightly_chubby_X like male, female, etc have (see topic #41949, which needs to be rejected)
And lastly remove the implication from the first BUR.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10765 (forum #443797) has been rejected by @jerdude002.

girly/femboy does not consist of just male, it includes all masculine genders (male, andromorph, maleherm)
It should be aliased directly to femboy rather than any implication/unimplication/invalidation nonsense

A request for this cannot be made however due to a BTR in topic #44091 which needs to be rejected first

donovan_dmc said:
girly/femboy is not the same as male, it includes all masculine genders (male, andromorph, maleherm)

Didn't know that, never really thought about it tbh but that makes sense. That does make it much more straightforward then xP

The bulk update request #10764 (forum #443796) has been rejected by @jerdude002.

The bulk update request #10765 (forum #443797) has been rejected by @jerdude002.