The bulk update request #10757 is active.
create implication holding_dumbbell (149) -> dumbbell (2872)
create implication holding_dumbbell (149) -> holding_object (206843)
create implication holding_coin (99) -> coin (5025)
create implication holding_coin (99) -> holding_object (206843)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (503) -> drinking_glass (9615)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (503) -> holding_cup (8706)
create implication holding_badge (38) -> badge (3551)
create implication holding_badge (38) -> holding_object (206843)
create implication holding_marker (233) -> marker (1552)
create implication holding_marker (233) -> holding_object (206843)
Reason: Came across a couple that seem valid enough without implications attached.
Not certain if holding_drinking_glass shouldn't alias first to holding_glass_cup and that to holding_cup, like the base object tags do, but this seems like unnecessary level off granularity?
EDIT: The bulk update request #10757 (forum #443694) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator