News: Apr 07, 2025 Show

April 7th:It's that time again e621! The 2025 staff drive will be opening later this week! Please get your resumes and forklift licenses ready and keep an eye on the news/forums. Hope to see some fresh meat for the salt mines.

Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.

Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.

Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Topic: A couple miscellaneous holding_object implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Bugabond

Member

The bulk update request #10757 is pending approval.

create implication holding_dumbbell (139) -> dumbbell (2750)
create implication holding_dumbbell (139) -> holding_object (197799)
create implication holding_coin (85) -> coin (4786)
create implication holding_coin (85) -> holding_object (197799)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (33) -> drinking_glass (8975)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (33) -> holding_cup (7909)
create implication holding_badge (36) -> badge (3472)
create implication holding_badge (36) -> holding_object (197799)
create implication holding_marker (224) -> marker (1434)
create implication holding_marker (224) -> holding_object (197799)

Reason: Came across a couple that seem valid enough without implications attached.

Not certain if holding_drinking_glass shouldn't alias first to holding_glass_cup and that to holding_cup, like the base object tags do, but this seems like unnecessary level off granularity?

Updated

Over 18?

You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.