The bulk update request #10757 is active.
create implication holding_dumbbell (152) -> dumbbell (2916)
create implication holding_dumbbell (152) -> holding_object (211152)
create implication holding_coin (100) -> coin (5120)
create implication holding_coin (100) -> holding_object (211152)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (544) -> drinking_glass (9865)
create implication holding_drinking_glass (544) -> holding_cup (8907)
create implication holding_badge (38) -> badge (3605)
create implication holding_badge (38) -> holding_object (211152)
create implication holding_marker (237) -> marker (1585)
create implication holding_marker (237) -> holding_object (211152)
Reason: Came across a couple that seem valid enough without implications attached.
Not certain if holding_drinking_glass shouldn't alias first to holding_glass_cup and that to holding_cup, like the base object tags do, but this seems like unnecessary level off granularity?
EDIT: The bulk update request #10757 (forum #443694) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator