Topic: [REJECTED] Knotted Penis

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #10696 has been rejected.

create implication knot_fucking (1797) -> knotted_penis (23915)
create implication knotting (29445) -> knotted_penis (23915)

Reason: I believe neither knotting nor knot fucking can be applied to knotted dildos, that only leaves knotted penis left.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10696 (forum #442649) has been rejected by @romanicyte2.

Updated by auto moderator

donovan_dmc said:
These implications cannot exist due to knotting being visible/known without the actual knot or penis being visible

You have to see the knot for knot_fucking, so that one is fine.

Watsit

Privileged

thegreatwolfgang said:
Theoretically, since knot_bulge exists and does knot imply knot, an animated post with a knot_bulge would knot show a knot but would still be applicable for knot_fucking.

Knot_fucking requires the knot to be continually pulled out and pushed in to the orifice. Unlike knotting, where the knot stays in and can be determined via a knot_bulge or knot_root without the knot itself visible, I can't think of how knot_fucking can get away without seeing a knot.

watsit said:
Knot_fucking requires the knot to be continually pulled out and pushed in to the orifice. Unlike knotting, where the knot stays in and can be determined via a knot_bulge or knot_root without the knot itself visible, I can't think of how knot_fucking can get away without seeing a knot.

That's why I said theoretically, most of the time the artist would draw a visible knot, but sometimes they draw obscured_sex/obscured_penetration instead.
Imagine post #3294186 was animated and there was a clear knot_bulge, then the character lifts themselves up and the bulge disappears, before sitting back down again with the knot being drawn back up their belly.