The bulk update request #10656 is pending approval.

remove implication after_vore (6747) -> vore (76994)

Reason: I think that we should unalias unimply after_vore to vore because after_vore is a picture where vore is finished. It doesn't imply seeing what is before the end. For example it can be just a creature shitting what has been someone before. If I am searching for the vore tag, I want to see vore happening - someone in the body of someone else -, not just seeing a finished state (literally shit !).
It's like if when searching for a "construction_of_building" we got pictures of finished building because "finished_building" imply "construction_of_building".
The principle is "tag what your see", not "tag what has happened before".

It's not aliased, it's implied

If there's bones/character remains in the turds imo vore still applies.
That said, there's a decent number of posts that quite possibly shouldn't even be tagged after_vore at all.
post #5395903
It's nicer to clean up one bad tag than multiple.

pankino2002 said:
It's not aliased, it's implied

Big Oops ! I mean unimply.

after_sex and after_transformation do not imply their antecedents so this BUR makes logical sense to me.

regsmutt said:
If there's bones/character remains in the turds imo vore still applies.
That said, there's a decent number of posts that quite possibly shouldn't even be tagged after_vore at all.
post #5395903
It's nicer to clean up one bad tag than multiple.

Actually, changing my vote to :|
If there's no vore elements present, after_vore is not twys. If there ARE vore elements present, then the vore tag applies. If you don't want to see disposal, blacklist disposal and/or feces and/or scat.
Not a hard 'no' vote because, as said, it's nicer for clean-up when there's a lot of grey-area and invalid uses.

vore acts a bit more like a 'theme' tag then the others mentioned. It could be separated, but works relatively well as-is.
Though, the fact that after_vore implies it but imminent_vore is explicitly not vore is a disconnect, that this would fix.

scth said:
vore acts a bit more like a 'theme' tag then the others mentioned. It could be separated, but works relatively well as-is.

It's not vague, it's a character going/being in an other character. When a character is dead it is no longer vore.
About that, the wiki exactly said :

The vore tag applies to the act of a character ingesting/being ingested by another, not for a general "vore theme"

If someone want a broader vore theme, maybe a new tag could be created that would include : mouth_shot, imminent_vore, vore and after_vore.
If imminent_vore is not vore, it's for a reason. It's because the vore scene is not happening yet. after_vore has the same issue, it has happened before.