Topic: [REJECTED] Tag implication: dog_man -> dogman

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Dogman (and "dog man") isn't a very good name. Aside from the michigan dogman, the term is another way to describe werewolves and other anthro/humanoid canids.

The bulk update request #10644 is active.

create alias dogman (6) -> dog_man_(disambiguation) (0)
create alias dog_man (9) -> dog_man_(disambiguation) (0)
create implication dog_man_(character) (89) -> dog_man_(series) (110)
create implication petey_the_cat (80) -> dog_man_(series) (110)

Reason: "Dog Man" can refer to several things:

The third one in particular is being tagged a lot more since the movie came out recently, so this is to clear up any potential confusion. Let me know if I did this BUR wrong or if I need to add anything.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10644 (forum #441972) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias dogman -> dog_man_(disambiguation))

EDIT: The bulk update request #10644 (forum #441972) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias dogman -> dog_man_(disambiguation))

EDIT: The bulk update request #10644 (forum #441972) has been approved by @spe.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #10652 is pending approval.

remove implication grace_(dogman) (0) -> dogman_(series) (0)
remove implication li'l_petey (0) -> dogman_(series) (0)
create implication grace_(dog_man) (4) -> dog_man_(series) (110)
create implication li'l_petey (0) -> dog_man_(series) (110)
create alias li'l_petey_(dog_man) (9) -> li'l_petey (0)

Reason: Apparently these need to be fixed as well.

also tell me if im wrong but i think li'l petey is unique enough to not need the suffix but i can flip it if needed.

followup:

alias grace_(dogman) -> grace_(dog_man)

Updated