The tag implication #66615 gold_tiara -> tiara has been approved.

Reason: Self-explanatory.

EDIT: The tag implication gold_tiara -> tiara (forum #439845) has been approved by @spe.

The tag implication gold_tiara -> tiara (forum #439845) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #10454 is active.

create implication gold_tiara (372) -> gold_(metal) (32251)

Reason: it's made of gold.
...
unless we want to imply to gold_jewelry, although, tiara itself dosn't currently imply jewelry.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10454 (forum #440083) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #10454 (forum #440083) has been approved by @spe.

dba_afish said:
...
unless we want to imply to gold_jewelry, although, tiara itself dosn't currently imply jewelry.

hmm… well Wikipedia does refer to it as jewelry at a few points in the article.
But it currently implies crown which is most definitely not jewelry. But could it be both…? But that implies headgear which feels wrong for jewelry.
Tbh, I’m not even sure if a tiara should be considered a crown. The Wikipedia article doesn’t refer to it as a crown at all.

spe said:
Tbh, I’m not even sure if a tiara should be considered a crown. The Wikipedia article doesn’t refer to it as a crown at all.

I kinda agree with this, it's probably worth a thread/unimply request