The bulk update request #10403 is pending approval.

create alias dicephalic_twins (113) -> dicephalic_twins_(lore) (0)
create implication dicephalic_twins_(lore) (0) -> twins_(lore) (9731)

Reason: Ignore the outdated text on the topic. Changing previous implication to alias and a new implication for the alias tag.

Shouldn’t this also be changed into a lore tag? Otherwise what’s the difference between this tag and 2_heads?

spe said:
Shouldn’t this also be changed into a lore tag? Otherwise what’s the difference between this tag and 2_heads?

Changed implication to alias and made a new implication for the alias

While we’re at it, does anything need to be done with conjoined_twins? We already have a conjoined tag.