The tag implication #66493 taguel -> fire_emblem_awakening is pending approval.

Reason: Wiki says this species is from Fire Emblem, specifically Awakening.

The bulk update request #10344 is pending approval.

create implication manakete (118) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication laguz (55) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create alias wolfskin (132) -> werewolf (30209)

Reason: While we're at it.

beholding said:
The bulk update request #10344 is pending approval.

create implication manakete (118) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication laguz (55) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create alias wolfskin (132) -> werewolf (30209)

Reason: While we're at it.

Should wolfskin be aliased to werewolf? A lot of those images are more akin to just animal humanoids. Idk too much about fire emblem, but they don’t look like traditional werewolves, so it might be best to leave them as their own separate tag.

manitka said:
Should wolfskin be aliased to werewolf? A lot of those images are more akin to just animal humanoids. Idk too much about fire emblem, but they don’t look like traditional werewolves, so it might be best to leave them as their own separate tag.

Those images are of characters wearing a literal wolfskin. We may need to make a wolfskin_(clothing) tag or similar.

A quick Google of "wolfskin creature" returns only Fire Emblem and Dungeons & Dragons, where it is a ranger subclass. I don't see how the Fire Emblem incarnation is meaningfully different from werewolves: they're humanoids that transform into wolf monsters.

beholding said:
Those images are of characters wearing a literal wolfskin. We may need to make a wolfskin_(clothing) tag or similar.

A quick Google of "wolfskin creature" returns only Fire Emblem and Dungeons & Dragons, where it is a ranger subclass. I don't see how the Fire Emblem incarnation is meaningfully different from werewolves: they're humanoids that transform into wolf monsters.

idk if these are what people are looking for when searching for werewolves, and they don't really fit in e6's rules for what is and isn't a werewolf.

post #3672128 post #1086325 post #4134623 post #878218

these are not "characters wearing a literal wolfskin." they are animal_humanoids, and certianly don't look like werewolves to me.

Ah sorry, I was searching wolfskin -fire_emblem. You're touching on a related debate, though, which is whether werewolves should be an allowed tag at all. The characters in those images are wolfskins in human form, but that's not obvious from a single image. (Their monster forms are more straightforwardly werewolf-looking.)