Topic: Fire Emblem BURs

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Beholding

Member

The bulk update request #10327 is pending approval.

create implication fire_emblem_fates (490) -> fire_emblem (1361)
remove implication corrin_(fire_emblem) (162) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication corrin_(fire_emblem)_(male) (109) -> corrin_(fire_emblem) (162)
create implication corrin_(fire_emblem)_(female) (89) -> corrin_(fire_emblem) (162)
create implication kaden_(fire_emblem) (31) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create alias selkie_(fire_emblem_fates) (89) -> selkie_(fire_emblem) (0)
create implication selkie_(fire_emblem) (0) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication keaton_(fire_emblem) (105) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication velouria (30) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication lilith_(fire_emblem) (10) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication ryoma_(fire_emblem) (5) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication hinoka_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication sakura_(fire_emblem) (8) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication takumi_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication xander_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication camilla_(fire_emblem) (48) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication azura_(fire_emblem) (10) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)
create implication felicia_(fire_emblem) (7) -> fire_emblem_fates (490)

Reason: Implicating Fire Emblem Fates characters to their copyrights, and Fire Emblem Fates itself to Fire Emblem. Let me know if I missed anyone.

Updated

Beholding

Member

snpthecat said:
Also there's some contention around double suffixes see topic #54285

So I see. I personally prefer suffixes because tags are alphabetical, so putting adjectives in front results in scattering related tags all over the list. Suffixes also work better with autocomplete. That said, I can remove the Corrin implications if that's an issue.

Beholding

Member

The bulk update request #10330 is pending approval.

create implication marth_(fire_emblem) (27) -> fire_emblem_mystery_of_the_emblem (84)
create implication tiki_(fire_emblem) (42) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication celica_(fire_emblem) (8) -> fire_emblem_echoes (14)
create implication sonya_(fire_emblem) (5) -> fire_emblem_echoes (14)
create implication roy_(fire_emblem) (54) -> fire_emblem_the_binding_blade (89)
create implication fae_(fire_emblem) (18) -> fire_emblem_the_binding_blade (89)
create implication idunn_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_the_binding_blade (89)
create implication igrene_(fire_emblem) (10) -> fire_emblem_the_binding_blade (89)
create implication fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication lyn_(fire_emblem) (10) -> fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35)
create implication ninian_(fire_emblem) (13) -> fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35)
create implication priscilla_(fire_emblem) (2) -> fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35)
create implication florina_(fire_emblem) (9) -> fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35)
create implication huey_(fire_emblem) (9) -> fire_emblem_the_blazing_blade (35)
create alias fire_emblem_sacred_stones (53) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)
create implication fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0) -> fire_emblem (1361)
create implication fomortiis (28) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)
create implication eirika_(fire_emblem) (7) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)
create implication myrrh_(fire_emblem) (7) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)
create implication lute_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)
create implication valter_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_the_sacred_stones (0)

Reason: Additional implications. Tiki is the only other Mystery of the Emblem character who's tagged here, but she shouldn't be implicated since she also appears in Awakening. We have tags for a few other Binding Blade characters, but they only have 1 post each, so I'm neglecting them for now.

Not sure how to handle Eliwood and Hector. They technically appear in both Binding and Blazing Blades, but the only posts of them are in their Blazing Blade incarnations.

Beholding

Member

The bulk update request #10337 is pending approval.

create implication ike_(fire_emblem) (69) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication ranulf_(fire_emblem) (7) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication lethe_(fire_emblem) (18) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication lyre_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication caineghis_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication tibarn_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication mia_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication nailah_(fire_emblem) (12) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication mordecai_(fire_emblem) (10) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication volug_(fire_emblem) (2) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication jill_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication vika_(fire_emblem) (2) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication ulki_(fire_emblem) (2) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication boyd_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)
create implication muarim_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_radiant_dawn (94)

Reason: And the Tellius games. Using the precedent set by Marth's implication, I'm implying these characters to Radiant Dawn only.

(I must admit I'm a little surprised there's nothing at all for the herons, dragons, Lehran, or Naesala.)

Updated

Beholding

Member

The bulk update request #10339 is pending approval.

create implication robin_(fire_emblem) (88) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication robin_(fire_emblem)_(male) (41) -> robin_(fire_emblem) (88)
create implication robin_(fire_emblem)_(female) (27) -> robin_(fire_emblem) (88)
create implication panne (43) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication yarne (22) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication lissa_(fire_emblem) (5) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication frederick_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication tharja_(fire_emblem) (29) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication olivia_(fire_emblem) (4) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication cordelia_(fire_emblem) (5) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication henry_(fire_emblem) (5) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication cherche (5) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication nah_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication severa_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication virion (3) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication stahl_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication sully_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication nowi (22) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)
create implication grima_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_awakening (351)

Reason: And Awakening. Chrom and Lucina are excluded because they're currently split between suffixed and unsuffixed tags. We'll need to resolve that before deciding which tag to implicate.

As per usual, characters with 2 or fewer posts at this time are excluded.

Beholding

Member

The bulk update request #10343 is pending approval.

create alias byleth_(fire_emblem) (64) -> byleth_eisner (0)
create implication byleth_eisner (0) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias byleth_(fire_emblem)_(male) (17) -> byleth_eisner_(male) (0)
create alias byleth_(fire_emblem)_(female) (42) -> byleth_eisner_(female) (0)
create implication byleth_eisner_(male) (0) -> byleth_eisner (0)
create implication byleth_eisner_(female) (0) -> byleth_eisner (0)
create implication edelgard_von_hresvelg (20) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias dimitri_(fire_emblem) (3) -> dimitri_alexandre_blaiddyd (5)
create implication dimitri_alexandre_blaiddyd (5) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias marianne_(fire_emblem) (20) -> marianne_von_edmund (11)
create implication marianne_von_edmund (11) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias ingrid_(fire_emblem) (19) -> ingrid_brandl_galatea (0)
create implication ingrid_brandl_galatea (0) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias shamir_(fire_emblem) (4) -> shamir_nevrand (0)
create implication shamir_nevrand (0) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias hilda_(fire_emblem) (7) -> hilda_valentine_goneril (0)
create implication hilda_valentine_goneril (0) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication bernadetta_von_varley (6) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create alias leonie_(fire_emblem) (5) -> leonie_pinelli (0)
create implication leonie_pinelli (0) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication kronya_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication rhea_(fire_emblem) (13) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication the_immaculate_one (9) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication sothis_(fire_emblem) (6) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)
create implication flayn_(fire_emblem) (3) -> fire_emblem_three_houses (169)

Reason: And Three Houses. These characters actually have canon full names, so the _(fire emblem) tags should be aliased to those.

Beholding

Member

What are peoples' opinions on creating separate tags for Tiki's Mystery and Awakening forms?