The tag implication #66320 blindfold_only -> blindfold has been approved.

Reason: Self-explanatory.

Related topic: Do blindfolds count as clothing? Currently the tag does not implicate clothing, but is this a mistake?

EDIT: The tag implication blindfold_only -> blindfold (forum #436405) has been approved by @furrypickle.

eyewear doesn't imply clothing, and blindfold is in the same ballpark as eyewear.

Also that's strange, a *wear tag not implying clothing?
Oh yeah eyewear_only implies nude, this should too.

The tag implication blindfold_only -> blindfold (forum #436405) has been approved by @furrypickle.

The bulk update request #10699 is active.

create implication blindfold_only (106) -> nude (1360549)

Reason: I'm not certain if blindfolds count as eyewear, and whether wearing a blindfold would make it count as eyewear (these two are separate questions, armor is not clothing but wearing it means you're clothed (tangential question but should we canonise armor only? Though the problem is you can't see under the armor so it's not very taggable))

EDIT: The bulk update request #10699 (forum #442725) has been approved by @spe.

The bulk update request #10699 (forum #442725) has been approved by @spe.