The bulk update request #10136 has been rejected.

create implication avian_demon (888) -> avian (213149)
create implication avian_demon (888) -> demon (132635)
create implication arthropod_demon (1) -> arthropod (91092)
create implication arthropod_demon (1) -> demon (132635)
create implication marine_demon (1) -> marine (158192)
create implication marine_demon (1) -> demon (132635)
create implication amphibian_demon (2) -> amphibian (25366)
create implication amphibian_demon (2) -> demon (132635)
create implication reptile_demon (2) -> reptile (279895)
create implication reptile_demon (2) -> demon (132635)

Reason: Not 100% sure about this, but thought it was worth pitching.

The demon tag is very vaguely defined. It isn't really a specific species at all, more of a vibe. But it still has its value. I think that tags which reference demons but don't imply it should do so. This BUR is a very conservative method which doesn't imply the direct species until the tag reaches its most general animal category. It could easily be changed to imply the species first time around though.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10136 (forum #436021) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.

The bulk update request #10137 has been rejected.

Reason: Cont.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10137 (forum #436022) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.

The bulk update request #10138 has been rejected.

create implication wolf_demon (121) -> canine_demon (111)
create implication dog_demon (13) -> canine_demon (111)
create implication canine_demon (111) -> canid_demon (32781)
create implication lion_demon (22) -> pantherine_demon (1)
create implication tiger_demon (1) -> pantherine_demon (1)
create implication pantherine_demon (1) -> feline_demon (178)
create implication cat_demon (379) -> feline_demon (178)
create implication feline_demon (178) -> felid_demon (215)
create implication felid_demon (215) -> felid (777327)
create implication felid_demon (215) -> demon (132635)
create alias ursid_demon (0) -> bear_demon (10)
create implication bear_demon (10) -> bear (146896)
create implication bear_demon (10) -> demon (132635)
remove implication caprine_demon (4832) -> demon (132635)
create implication caprine_demon (4832) -> bovid_demon (14)
create implication deer_demon (8) -> bovid_demon (14)
create implication bovid_demon (14) -> bovid (217181)
create implication bovid_demon (14) -> demon (132635)

Reason: Not sure about if "mammal demon" makes sense, though.

EDIT: The bulk update request #10138 (forum #436023) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.

These seem excessive, to have "demon" variations of individual species tags. There's a lot of species, and especially as demon itself is difficult to quantify. Better to alias, IMO.

Yeah, no, we don't need yet another set of species tags. I'm already against the sets for humanoid and taur, let alone something like this. All of these should just be aliased.

the only ones that really make sense in my eyes are the more "traditionally demonic" things, like hellhounds, caprine_demons, and just generic demon_humanoids everything else is bloat.

The bulk update request #10138 (forum #436023) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.

The bulk update request #10137 (forum #436022) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.

The bulk update request #10136 (forum #436021) has been rejected by @heartstoppa.