Topic: [REJECTED] human penetrating BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

jerdude002

Member

The bulk update request #9836 has been rejected.

create implication human_penetrating_female (17183) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_female (17183) -> female_penetrated (343365)
create implication human_penetrating_female (17183) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_female (17183) -> female_on_human (51764)
create implication human_penetrating_male (1441) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_male (1441) -> male_penetrated (245405)
create implication human_penetrating_male (1441) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_male (1441) -> male_on_human (26618)
create implication human_penetrating_taur (233) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_ambiguous (165) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_ambiguous (165) -> ambiguous_penetrated (7275)
create implication human_penetrating_ambiguous (165) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_ambiguous (165) -> ambiguous_on_human (2186)
create implication human_penetrating_intersex (88) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_intersex (88) -> intersex_penetrated (22919)
create implication human_penetrating_intersex (88) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_intersex (88) -> intersex_on_human (1656)
create implication human_penetrating_gynomorph (55) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_gynomorph (55) -> gynomorph_penetrated (11484)
create implication human_penetrating_gynomorph (55) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_gynomorph (55) -> gynomorph_on_human (1425)
create implication human_penetrating_andromorph (22) -> human_penetrating (63452)
create implication human_penetrating_andromorph (22) -> andromorph_penetrated (6023)
create implication human_penetrating_andromorph (22) -> sex (1121994)
create implication human_penetrating_andromorph (22) -> andromorph_on_human (83)

Reason: Getting the implications for these tags in line with those of human_penetrating_feral and human_penetrating_anthro for example

EDIT: The bulk update request #9836 (forum #425970) has been rejected by @jerdude002.

Updated by auto moderator

SNPtheCat

Member

-1
we're trying to get rid of gender on form and even if we weren't, having gender_penetrating_form is excessive

jerdude002

Member

snpthecat said:
-1
we're trying to get rid of gender on form and even if we weren't, having gender_penetrating_form is excessive

In that case, I'll just go on ahead and reject it. I was on the fence about posting this because I agree it is excessive. Only posted it because of the other tags having similar implications.