News: Apr 09, 2025 Show

April 9th: Our dedicated FurID gallery is now live. Thank you all for the submissions to our little April Fool's prank, we hope you had as much fun as we did!

April 7th: It's that time again e621! The 2025 staff drive will be opening later this week! Please get your resumes and forklift licenses ready and keep an eye on the news/forums. Hope to see some fresh meat for the salt mines.

We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!

Topic: *_only (clothing) tag implications BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #9688 is pending approval.

create implication armwear_only (1166) -> armwear (91003)
create implication thigh_highs_only (1283) -> thigh_highs (144483)
create implication thigh_highs_only (1283) -> legwear_only (3957)
create implication thigh_highs_only (1283) -> mostly_nude (132365)
create implication pants_only (806) -> pants (190856)
create implication pants_only (806) -> topless (138562)
create implication cloak_only (914) -> cloak (12970)
create implication overalls_only (872) -> overalls (10192)
create implication bracelet_only (403) -> bracelet (64457)
create implication dress_only (424) -> dress (92121)
create implication beanie_only (507) -> beanie (11682) # duplicate of implication #53021
create implication beanie_only (507) -> hat_only (10255) # duplicate of implication #63768
create implication belt_only (331) -> belt (64482)
create implication leggings_only (328) -> legwear_only (3957)
create implication bikini_bottom_only (261) -> bikini_bottom (8886)
create implication bikini_bottom_only (261) -> topless (138562)
create implication bikini_top_only (120) -> bikini_top (12649)
create implication bikini_top_only (120) -> topwear_only (12159)

Reason: Most of these should be pretty self-explanatory and straightforward.

Some which could be added but I'm not sure about:

  • imply swimwear_only -> swimwear (swimwear_only just seems like a bit of a weird tag to me but on the surface it makes sense)
  • imply belt_only -> mostly_nude (I feel like this makes sense to me logically, but it might not fall within the wiki's current definition for mostly_nude of having nothing on the torso)

Edit: Regarding the duplicate implications for beanie_only the tag could be aliased away if desired after the implications are made (as suggested in one of the previous forum posts).

Updated

watsit said:
This would be a problem for ferals with a bracelet_only, causing them to be tagged nude when they shouldn't be (ferals are assumed nude, and get tagged clothed_feral when not). I also notice it getting used incorrectly a lot for bowser, when he's wearing spiked_bracelets on his wrists along with spiked_armbands on his upper arm and a spiked_collar (so not bracelet_only).

Alright, I removed that one. Is there anything else like that that would be an issue specifically with ferals? (I'll also note that I chose to implicate mostly_nude from thigh_highs_only since stockings_only already had that implication.)

watsit said:
This would be a problem for ferals with a bracelet_only, causing them to be tagged nude when they shouldn't be (ferals are assumed nude, and get tagged clothed_feral when not). I also notice it getting used incorrectly a lot for bowser, when he's wearing spiked_bracelets on his wrists along with spiked_armbands on his upper arm and a spiked_collar (so not bracelet_only).

Huh, so should all of boa_only, chastity_device_only, collar_only, eyewear_only, mask_only, and necklace_only have their nude implications removed, or are they restricted to non-ferals only

snpthecat said:
Huh, so should all of boa_only, chastity_device_only, collar_only, eyewear_only, mask_only, and necklace_only have their nude implications removed, or are they restricted to non-ferals only

These should only be used on non-ferals, imo. When you'd tag collar_only it's because you'd usually be expecting the character to be wearing more than just a collar. A feral dog? That's pretty normal to just be wearing a collar and nothing else.

Unfortunately, people are going to tag these on ferals either way.

Watsit

Privileged
2018 absurd_res animal_genitalia animal_penis anthro anus backsack ball_squish balls bead big_penis biped black_outline blue_eyes butt canid canine canine_genitalia canine_penis cel_shading claws digital_drawing_(artwork) digital_media_(artwork) erection feet fur generation_5_pokemon genitals glistening glistening_claws glistening_eyes glistening_genitalia glistening_penis grey_balls grey_body grey_fur grey_perineum hair hi_res knot looking_at_viewer looking_back looking_back_at_viewer lying male male_anthro mammal nintendo noseless nude on_side outline penis perineum pink_anus pink_penis pokemon pokemon_(species) presenting presenting_anus presenting_balls presenting_hindquarters presenting_penis rear_view red_claws red_hair roy_arashi seductive shaded simple_background smile smiling_at_viewer soles solo squish tapering_penis tapering_snout zoroark

snpthecat said:
So what do you think? Should these *_only tags be exclusive to non-ferals?

This seems like it would be unnecessarily restrictive. While you could make an argument for collar_only being redundant with a feral, other tags like glasses_only or bracelet_only would not be so redundant, and would be useful to distinguish between ferals wearing just glasses, or glasses with bracelets and/or necklaces, etc.

Tangentially, it seems a number of *_only tags are misused pretty often. bracelet_only collar_only is a somewhat common combo (before I cleaned them up, both tags referring to the same character), but who knows how many other *_only tags are used with a character wearing other things too.

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #9699 is pending approval.

create implication bracelet_only (403) -> nude (1323474)

Reason: So what do you think? Should these *_only tags be exclusive to non-ferals?

I have been singing this song since oh so long ago, see topic #29983 & topic #34690.

The admin says we should not be tagging *_only on ferals (and should be using clothed_feral + aforementioned clothing).
However, unless there is a big red disclaimer on every *_only tag to NOT be tagging them on ferals, I don't think people will stop doing so.

Actually I do agree with the others here that it makes more sense to simply not use *_only tags with ferals since arguably the whole point of *_only tags is to imply some degree of nudity, but ferals are expected to be nude by default (and thus shouldn't be tagged nude). Perhaps I should re-add that particular implication to the BUR?

Over 18?

You must be 18 years or older and agree to the terms of service to access this website.

Content that is commonly considered objectionable is blacklisted by default. You may remove tags from this blacklist using the corresponding menu item.