Topic: [REJECTED] [BUR Collection] Clothing state implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

atomicBlaze21

Member

The bulk update request #9447 has been rejected.

create implication clothed_female (39363) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_female (39363) -> female (2828730)
create implication clothed_male (25064) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_male (25064) -> male (2813495)
create implication clothed_intersex (4481) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_intersex (4481) -> intersex (278042)
create implication clothed_andromorph (217) -> clothed_intersex (4481)
create implication clothed_andromorph (217) -> andromorph (27276)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4510) -> clothed_intersex (4481)
create implication clothed_gynomorph (4510) -> gynomorph (217705)
create implication clothed_herm (166) -> clothed_intersex (4481)
create implication clothed_herm (166) -> herm (30256)
create implication clothed_maleherm (36) -> clothed_intersex (4481)
create implication clothed_maleherm (36) -> maleherm (5116)
create implication clothed_anthro (43669) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_anthro (43669) -> anthro (3755173)
create implication clothed_feral (9614) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_feral (9614) -> feral (676640)
create implication clothed_human (3709) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_human (3709) -> human (414630)
create implication clothed_taur (272) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_taur (272) -> taur (20743)

Reason: If a tag is able to indicate a clothing state along with either a gender, form, or role, that tag must imply both the clothing state (clothed, nude, etc.) and the gender/form/role. This is split into 5 separate BURs:

1. Clothed
2. Partially Clothed
3. Mostly Nude
4. Nude
5. Pred/Prey (I would have these in the first 4, but I would need 26 lines per BUR and BURs are limited to 25 lines. I wanted to avoid overflow so everything would play nice)

1/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9447 (forum #421725) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

Updated by auto moderator

atomicBlaze21

Member

The bulk update request #9448 has been rejected.

create implication partially_clothed_female (4060) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_female (4060) -> female (2828730)
create implication partially_clothed_male (2282) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_male (2282) -> male (2813495)
create implication partially_clothed_intersex (58) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_intersex (58) -> intersex (278042)
create implication partially_clothed_andromorph (18) -> partially_clothed_intersex (58)
create implication partially_clothed_andromorph (18) -> andromorph (27276)
create implication partially_clothed_gynomorph (104) -> partially_clothed_intersex (58)
create implication partially_clothed_gynomorph (104) -> gynomorph (217705)
create implication partially_clothed_herm (3) -> partially_clothed_intersex (58)
create implication partially_clothed_herm (3) -> herm (30256)
create implication partially_clothed_maleherm (0) -> partially_clothed_intersex (58)
create implication partially_clothed_maleherm (0) -> maleherm (5116)
create implication partially_clothed_anthro (5034) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_anthro (5034) -> anthro (3755173)
create implication partially_clothed_feral (0) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_feral (0) -> feral (676640)
create implication partially_clothed_human (261) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_human (261) -> human (414630)
create implication partially_clothed_taur (13) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_taur (13) -> taur (20743)

Reason: Part 2/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9448 (forum #421726) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

Updated by auto moderator

atomicBlaze21

Member

The bulk update request #9449 has been rejected.

create implication mostly_nude_female (5530) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_female (5530) -> female (2828730)
create implication mostly_nude_male (3668) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_male (3668) -> male (2813495)
create implication mostly_nude_intersex (2199) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_intersex (2199) -> intersex (278042)
create implication mostly_nude_andromorph (145) -> mostly_nude_intersex (2199)
create implication mostly_nude_andromorph (145) -> andromorph (27276)
create implication mostly_nude_gynomorph (2034) -> mostly_nude_intersex (2199)
create implication mostly_nude_gynomorph (2034) -> gynomorph (217705)
create implication mostly_nude_herm (152) -> mostly_nude_intersex (2199)
create implication mostly_nude_herm (152) -> herm (30256)
create implication mostly_nude_maleherm (11) -> mostly_nude_intersex (2199)
create implication mostly_nude_maleherm (11) -> maleherm (5116)
create implication mostly_nude_anthro (8825) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_anthro (8825) -> anthro (3755173)
create implication mostly_nude_feral (3) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_feral (3) -> feral (676640)
create implication mostly_nude_human (348) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_human (348) -> human (414630)
create implication mostly_nude_taur (31) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_taur (31) -> taur (20743)

Reason: Part 3/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9449 (forum #421727) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

Updated by auto moderator

atomicBlaze21

Member

The bulk update request #9450 has been rejected.

create implication nude_female (51614) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_female (51614) -> female (2828730)
create implication nude_male (46853) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_male (46853) -> male (2813495)
create implication nude_intersex (4890) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_intersex (4890) -> intersex (278042)
create implication nude_andromorph (1076) -> nude_intersex (4890)
create implication nude_andromorph (1076) -> andromorph (27276)
create implication nude_gynomorph (4830) -> nude_intersex (4890)
create implication nude_gynomorph (4830) -> gynomorph (217705)
create implication nude_herm (434) -> nude_intersex (4890)
create implication nude_herm (434) -> herm (30256)
create implication nude_maleherm (253) -> nude_intersex (4890)
create implication nude_maleherm (253) -> maleherm (5116)
create implication nude_anthro (67882) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_anthro (67882) -> anthro (3755173)
create implication nude_feral (57) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_feral (57) -> feral (676640)
create implication nude_human (3698) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_human (3698) -> human (414630)
create implication nude_taur (492) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_taur (492) -> taur (20743)

Reason: Part 4/5

EDIT: The bulk update request #9450 (forum #421728) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

Updated by auto moderator

atomicBlaze21

Member

The bulk update request #9451 has been rejected.

create implication clothed_prey (101) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication clothed_pred (89) -> clothed (1290401)
create implication partially_clothed_prey (0) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication partially_clothed_pred (0) -> partially_clothed (147952)
create implication mostly_nude_prey (0) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication mostly_nude_pred (1) -> mostly_nude (138786)
create implication nude_prey (196) -> nude (1387339)
create implication nude_pred (278) -> nude (1387339)

Reason: Part 5/5

Change of plans, I was not aware that the prey and pred tags had been aliased to invalid disambiguation tags. As such, I'll simply imply clothing state.

EDIT: The bulk update request #9451 (forum #421730) has been rejected by @atomicBlaze21.

Updated by auto moderator

SNPtheCat

Member

First 4 are duplicates of both topic #40841 and topic #46735, and you've included some already existing implications.

As for clothedness of pred and prey, i'm not exactly sure if we're gonna keep em. We've aliased more popular clothed_[role] tags before, such as clothed teacher and clothed_student (actually i'm not sure if it's more popular if it's just one person populating the tag)

Updated

atomicBlaze21

Member

snpthecat said:
First 4 are duplicates of both topic #40841 and topic #46735, and you've included some already existing implications.

As for clothedness of pred and prey, i'm not exactly sure if we're gonna keep em. We've aliased more popular clothed_[role] tags before, such as clothed teacher and clothed_student (actually i'm not sure if it's more popular if it's just one person populating the tag)

Well damn, I didn't see those in the pending implications list. As for existing duplicates, not all of them are active. I was planning on seeing which ones were already active and editing the BUR accordingly to remove those that were already covered.

It'd really be helpful to see pending BUR aliases and implications when searching for regular aliases and implications, otherwise I wouldn't have put this whole thing together almost a full week late.
I guess I'll just have to check individual implications and aliases as well as pending BURs now.

Updated

SNPtheCat

Member

atomicblaze21 said:
Well damn, I didn't see those in the pending implications list.

It'd really be helpful to see pending BUR aliases and implications when searching for regular aliases and implications, otherwise I wouldn't have put this whole thing together almost a full week late.
I guess I'll just have to check individual implications and aliases as well as pending BURs now.

You don't have to check (pending or otherwise) aliases and implications separately, MetaSearch goes for both. BURs on the other hand... they're separated from the alias and implication request system.

I would definitely be nice to have a place to see them all at once though, but I'm not so sure it'll come anytime soon.

As for existing duplicates, not all of them are active. I was planning on seeing which ones were already active and editing the BUR accordingly to remove those that were already covered.

Fair enough, but their presence even whilst pending will block the BUR.