The bulk update request #9330 is active.
create implication cross_ear_ring (150) -> cross_ear_piercing (376)
create implication cross_ear_piercing (376) -> cross_piercing (466)
create implication cross_piercing (466) -> piercing (453157)
create implication cross_piercing (466) -> cross (7776)
create implication inverted_cross_ear_ring (3) -> inverted_cross_ear_piercing (98)
create implication inverted_cross_ear_ring (3) -> cross_ear_ring (150)
create implication inverted_cross_ear_piercing (98) -> inverted_cross_piercing (102)
create implication inverted_cross_piercing (102) -> inverted_cross (1186)
Reason: Most of the cross ear piercings are not ear rings, a majority are stud ear piercings rather than ring piercings with crosses dangling off of them. Most of the rest is implying piercings to piercings. Inverted_cross implies cross, so the piercings should too.If people feel that we should separate cross_ear_piercing and cross_ear_ring I’ll add that to the BUR and remove the alias request this just made more sense to me than having two separate cross ear piercing tags.
So I sat down and went through the cross tag, there were a lot of untagged cross_ear_piercings (rings or otherwise), so I'm working on now keeping the cross_ear_ring in one tag and all cross_ear piercings in cross_ear_piercing.
edit: finally got around to fixing up the inverted_cross_ear_ring tags, now they are correctly sorted into inverted_cross_ear_piercing for all of them and inverted_cross_ear_ring for inverted cross piercings with rings instead of studs.
EDIT: The bulk update request #9330 (forum #420285) has been approved by @spe.
Updated by auto moderator