The bulk update request #9316 is active.

create alias bullfinch (3) -> true_bullfinch (28)
create alias pyrrhula (0) -> true_bullfinch (28)
create implication true_bullfinch (28) -> finch (622)
create implication eurasian_bullfinch (28) -> true_bullfinch (28)
create implication greater_antillean_bullfinch (3) -> tanager (96)

Reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhula

The pyrrhula genus's common name is the bullfinches, but several species of tanagers happen to also have "bullfinch" in their names: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullfinch
I figure we might as well follow Wikipedia's naming conventions and have our tag be pyrrhula

EDIT: The bulk update request #9316 (forum #420223) has been approved by @spe.

pyrrhula should also imply finch, no?

spe said:
pyrrhula should also imply finch, no?

Added, thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullfinch

The page you link here says "true bullfinches", that could be used like true_fox or true_musteline are. If you go with that, you could alias pyrrhula to true_bullfinch; I'm always for aliasing genus names.

slocheze said:
The page you link here says "true bullfinches", that could be used like true_fox or true_musteline are. If you go with that, you could alias pyrrhula to true_bullfinch; I'm always for aliasing genus names.

Sure, good idea. Editing

Don't forget to edit the implication

create implication eurasian_bullfinch (17) -> pyrrhula (1)

to point towards true_bullfinch instead.

clawstripe said:
Don't forget to edit the implication

create implication eurasian_bullfinch (17) -> pyrrhula (1)

to point towards true_bullfinch instead.

Whoops, fixed, thank you

Bumping, this look ok?

The bulk update request #9316 (forum #420223) has been approved by @spe.