The bulk update request #8936 is pending approval.

Reason: Here are my bulk request for the "toes" tags.

curling_toes can be applied to characters with featureless_feet. so, despite containing the word, it should not imply toes.

I feel like dipstick_toes might should be aliased to toeless_(marking), there doesn't seem to be much of a differentiation.

fused_toes doesn't seem to have a consistent definition, so I'm wary of adding implications to it.

See topic #45627 for part 2

I feel like we need to have a discussion over whether every single body part needs its own no-adjective tag in the first place. I know it has a pretty minimal effect on how many tags any given post has—even in a picture of 20 characters, each one is only going to show up once—but it seems unnecessary and unlikely that people are ever going to search for something as broad as, say, "eyes" or "hands".

errorist said:
I feel like we need to have a discussion over whether every single body part needs its own no-adjective tag in the first place. I know it has a pretty minimal effect on how many tags any given post has—even in a picture of 20 characters, each one is only going to show up once—but it seems unnecessary and unlikely that people are ever going to search for something as broad as, say, "eyes" or "hands".

There’s definitely people searching specifically for toes though.

claw_toes:

Claws that entirely replace toes

Seems different from toe claws. Maybe a bit of a confusing name, but doesn't really seem to be misused much...

spe said:
claw_toes: Seems different from toe claws. Maybe a bit of a confusing name, but doesn't really seem to be misused much...

How often are claws-as-toes tagged toe_claws instead of claw_toes, leading to it being under-tagged? claw_toes does sound a bit odd, it may be that toe_claws is easier to remember and gets tagged for both claws-as-toes and claws-on-toes. It could certainly use a better name.