The bulk update request #8902 is pending approval.

create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication khamega (5) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> demon (124891)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> demon (124891)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> demon (124891)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> demon (124891)

Reason: Janitor recommended updating the tag to disambiguate. From what I can see Fire Demon needs to be done manually because its also a final fantasy species?

ceilingfixing said:
The bulk update request #8902 is pending approval.

create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication khamega (5) -> slightly_damned (987)
create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> demon (124891)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> demon (124891)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> demon (124891)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> demon (124891)

Reason: Janitor recommended updating the tag to disambiguate. From what I can see Fire Demon needs to be done manually because its also a final fantasy species?

Went ahead and retagged results of fire_demon slightly_damned and the others look unrelated so left alone.

alphamule said:
Went ahead and retagged results of fire_demon slightly_damned and the others look unrelated so left alone.

I started slowly sifting through slightly_damned -earth_demon_(slightly_damned) -fire_demon_(slightly_damned) -wind_demon_(slightly_damned) -water_demon_(slightly_damned) looking for relevant posts

ceilingfixing said:
I started slowly sifting through slightly_damned -earth_demon_(slightly_damned) -fire_demon_(slightly_damned) -wind_demon_(slightly_damned) -water_demon_(slightly_damned) looking for relevant posts

*_demon slightly_damned Ain't a whole lot left. Cool!
slightly_damned *_demon -canid_demon Results after specifically looking for each element by itself.

The demon tag doesn't seem like it would always apply to these species. Not that demon isn't already heavily misused, one of the reasons I'd like to rename it, but these implications would knowingly make it worse.

Probably going to agree with Watsit here. They may be demons in lore, but these creatures don't look much like traditional demons. The demon tag should ideally be reserved for traditional-looking demons, like the red-skinned creatures with horns, spade tails, goat legs, bat wings, etc. etc..

Could just have these all imply demon_(slightly_damned) instead?

spe said:
Probably going to agree with Watsit here. They may be demons in lore, but these creatures don't look much like traditional demons. The demon tag should ideally be reserved for traditional-looking demons, like the red-skinned creatures with horns, spade tails, goat legs, bat wings, etc. etc..

Could just have these all imply demon_(slightly_damned) instead?

I guess? The main point is the first set of implications, if the last half needs to be removed or edited then so be it. If more people, especially staff, are leaning that way then sounds good to me.

The bulk update request #10261 is pending approval.

create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication demon_(slightly_damned) (0) -> slightly_damned (987)

Reason: Why not? Let's try the alternative

Edit: removed duplicate

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #10261 is pending approval.

create implication water_demon_(slightly_damned) (37) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication fire_demon_(slightly_damned) (193) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication wind_demon_(slightly_damned) (131) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication earth_demon_(slightly_damned) (97) -> demon_(slightly_damned) (0)
create implication demon_(slightly_damned) (0) -> slightly_damned (987)

Reason: Why not? Let's try the alternative

Probably don’t need each of the individual demons to imply slightly_damned, could just have demon_(slightly_damned) imply it.

damnit i knew i was forgetting something