This post was approved by a moderator in November, then someone reported it as Young Human and got eliminated it for another reason for the same moderator
https://e621.net/posts/5200929
___________________________
https://e621.net/posts/4376371
https://e621.net/posts/2670337
Topic: [Rally Point] >>>> Reversals for the young purge go here <<<<
Posted under General
this isn't a human
https://e621.net/posts/5097419
and theres certainly isn't any young in these, its a giantess with an adult human
https://e621.net/posts/5332787
https://e621.net/posts/5332766
https://e621.net/posts/5332794
https://e621.net/posts/5332800
Maybe I just don't know what I'm doing but the posts.csv files in db export don't seem to have anything tagged "younghumanpurge" except for a single post and I don't think the db export has deletion reasons either. Is there any way to get a list of affected post IDs besides manually browsing or scraping the site?
Updated
luckycoyote said:
Maybe I just don't know what I'm doing but the posts.csv files in db export don't seem to have anything tagged "younghumanpurge" except for a single post and I don't think the db export has deletion reasons either. Is there anyway to get a list of affected post IDs?
Not through the DB export. delreason:*purge* only has 112 pages if you use the maximum posts per page limit of 320, though, so easy enough to go through by script.
scth said:
Not through the DB export. delreason:*purge* only has 112 pages if you use the maximum posts per page limit of 320, though, so easy enough to go through by script.
Guess I was really overthinking this. All you have to do is:
gallery-dl -s -f {id} "https://e621.net/posts?tags=delreason%3A*young*human*" > purge.txtUpdated
https://e621.net/posts/318732
https://e621.net/posts/3296943
Also, as far as I know, Dagasi never draws human children:
https://e621.net/posts?tags=dagasi+young_humanoid+status:deleted
Updated
https://e621.net/posts/4148966
------------------------------------
Most certainly not a young-human in this one.
https://e621.net/posts/981528?
looks like teen
https://e621.net/posts/2832009
mistagged anthro
This is a Ralts, not a young human. I reported it directly to NotMeNotYou a while ago, but nothing seems to have changed
https://e621.net/posts/4488713
https://e621.net/posts/2027883
https://e621.net/posts/2267466 (and children)
https://e621.net/posts/2962029/
I don't see any content that looks underage in the video
https://e621.net/posts/4486666
Young human turns into anthro and only then is engaged in sexual activity.
https://e621.net/posts/1719844
https://e621.net/posts/1488619
https://e621.net/posts/1488618
https://e621.net/posts/1488617
https://e621.net/posts/1485015
https://e621.net/posts/1419103
https://e621.net/posts/1367036
https://e621.net/posts/1353317
https://e621.net/posts/1209676
https://e621.net/posts/1209675
https://e621.net/posts/3209136
The character silver seams to be tagged as "young" in some panels, but is not considered you in most other pages. Any young characters shown are not lewd or nude in any way.
https://e621.net/posts/1318279?pool_id=12304
https://e621.net/posts/1279072?pool_id=12097
Going through an old comic and these two posts were deleted. Here are the images in question.
https://64.media.tumblr.com/29417e35dd42cd120e135e728d877db6/tumblr_ot66eaSTHz1rqejd7o1_r1_1280.png
https://64.media.tumblr.com/c6f02bef9010f74304abf69d17c28078/tumblr_ovgzjqgqN31rqejd7o1_r1_1280.png
"Any submissions containing underage human or human-like characters involved in explicit sexual activities, or featuring those characters nude with visible genitalia and / or anus, are not allowed."
The character isn't underage, but regardless of if just appearancewise they could be argued to look underage, they're not involved in any sexual activity, nor is there any visible genitalia. It's censored in one, and shadowed out in the other.
https://e621.net/posts/2027118
Character is an anthro rabbit.
https://e621.net/posts/5451301
Small-breasted =/= young.
Updated
https://e621.net/posts/1459797
https://e621.net/posts/1499536
https://e621.net/posts/1499535
https://e621.net/posts/1499534
These are Deku Scrubs. Tree people. Humanoid ≠ Human.
Here’s the post on R34xxx. The different posts are the specific camera angles.
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2664708&tags=deku_king+
critical_stiban said:
https://e621.net/posts/1459797
https://e621.net/posts/1499536
https://e621.net/posts/1499535
https://e621.net/posts/1499534These are Deku Scrubs. Tree people. Humanoid ≠ Human.
Here’s the post on R34xxx. The different posts are the specific camera angles.
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=2664708&tags=deku_king+
The purge affects both young humans and humanoids
snpthecat said:
The purge affects both young humans and humanoids
Ok but tree people?
could all of these be restored as well as the Meru tag? Meru was born on 9/5/2001 so she is 23 years old. As a matter of fact, when the ban purge happened 9 months ago, Meru would have still been of age, She is not a loli
https://e621.net/posts?tags=meru_%28merunyaa%29+webm+status%3Adeleted
source: https://www.xvideos.com/video.kfhalfk400c/meru_the_succubus_full_ova_1-5_
fast-forward to 8:56, you can see her ID, it says 9/05/2001.
Updated
https://e621.net/posts/4759057
This looked much more anthro rather than human-like to me, or is tan fur enough for something to get deleted?
Human female in this looks like a young woman imo.
https://e621.net/posts/5554244
https://e621.net/posts/5554245
Human female in these looks like a young woman to me.
Pool 7636, "Deception" by Master Ploxy, needs its deleted posts reinstated because there are no young humans featured in the comic.
/pools/7636?page=3
https://e621.net/posts/1566156
Can't check the pic as it's deleted but if it's the one I think it is the young human wasn't involved in anything sexual and it was a "what we did when we were young vs what we do now" and what they did what they were young part was SFW so I think it could be ok to restore.
https://e621.net/posts/5562820
I think this was wrongfully deleted.
Just more for the sake of preservation than anything, really. I debated for a long time if this was actually worth trying to keep.
https://e621.net/posts/4177403
There was no young human in this post
https://e621.net/posts/2328151
I believe this post was wrongfully deleted. Dezz is a relatively mainstream artist that does not draw young humans. The human in this image, I would argue, is an adult male.
https://e621.net/posts/5186290
Just an example of Butterchalk's art that was purged.
Most notably was everything under the tag "Amanda_Scratch".
Also most of Butterchalk's that also fell under the tag "Amalia_(Claralaine)"
Many, but not all, of Butterchalk's purged are small chested furred anthros.
I don't use the favorites feature, so I don't have direct links.
This is more of a question related to the removal rules. Was this removed due to the in the top right corner? Characters who are not tagged (so can't look them up) and blurry.
https://e621.net/posts/5414205
cadynn said:
This is more of a question related to the removal rules. Was this removed due to the in the top right corner? Characters who are not tagged (so can't look them up) and blurry.
https://e621.net/posts/5414205
This has nothing to do to do with this topic, that post doesn’t even have the young tag.
That picture is marked as being deleted for an underage character *owner* not a young-human. That means one of the characters belonged to someone who was under the age of 18 at art creation.
manitka said:
This has nothing to do to do with this topic, that post doesn’t even have the young tag.That picture is marked as being deleted for an underage character *owner* not a young-human. That means one of the characters belonged to someone who was under the age of 18 at art creation.
Well that clears it up.