The bulk update request #7676 is active.

remove implication oral_fingering (191) -> oral (314814)

Reason: oral specifically says it's for stimulation of genitals, so oral_fingering is not oral.

Also it can be done to one's self (which is why fingering doesn't imply sex, fingering_partner does)

EDIT: The bulk update request #7676 (forum #401685) has been approved by @slyroon.

Is there a solid difference between this and finger_in_mouth or is it just vibes?

regsmutt said:
Is there a solid difference between this and finger_in_mouth or is it just vibes?

I honestly have no idea and am questioning that myself, I just want the sex implication chain gone

regsmutt said:
Is there a solid difference between this and finger_in_mouth or is it just vibes?

we'd need to get rid of the implication to alias it away anyway, so.

nimphia said:
The bulk update request #7676 is active.

remove implication oral_fingering (191) -> oral (314814)

Reason: oral implies sex

Currently this leads to weird sex -rating:e tags that are more complicated to deal with since the sex tag is the mistag there but can't be removed.

oral doesn't implicate sex though (or anything for that matter)? The sex -rating:e is caused by other things

But yeah under the current definition oral_fingering is not oral

snpthecat said:
oral doesn't implicate sex though (or anything for that matter)? The sex -rating:e is caused by other things

But yeah under the current definition oral_fingering is not oral

Huh. I assumed it did, guess I was wrong, weird. But regardless, yeah, still doesn't fit the definition.

Edit: Twas fingering_partner ._.

The bulk update request #7676 (forum #401685) has been approved by @slyroon.